The Importance of Group Factors in the Delivery of Group-based Parenting Programmes: a Process Evaluation of Mellow Babies

Overview

Journal Front Child Adolesc Psychiatry

Date 2025 Jan 16

PMID 39816587

Authors

Jessica Tanner

Philip Wilson

Daniel Wight

Lucy Thompson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: The role of the group has been largely overlooked within evaluations of group-based parenting programmes. Group contextual factors, including size and level of homogeneity, may impact on essential group processes, such as group identification and cohesion, that are necessary to activate interpersonal change mechanisms and attain programme outcomes. This process evaluation of Mellow Babies, a 14-week attachment-based group parenting programme for mothers of infants aged under 18 months, explores how group context affected mother and practitioner experiences of the programme.

Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted with fourteen mothers and three practitioners from three different Mellow Babies groups. Framework Analysis was employed to analyse data, using groups as cases within the framework matrix while preserving individual participants within each case. This allowed comparisons to be made within and between groups.

Results: Four group contextual factors impacted on the quality of programme delivery: (1) group size; (2) level of group homogeneity; (3) pre-existing relationships; and (4) personalities within the group. These contextual factors affected the hypothesised intervention mechanisms: (1) fluid progression through the stages of group development; (2) a safe, non-judgemental, contained space; (3) social identification with group; (4) group cohesion; and (5) a culture of openness, support and empowerment.

Discussion: Findings have implications for future delivery and implementation of group-based parenting programmes, for example, the importance of considering group composition during programme recruitment. Practitioners may also benefit from a stronger focus on group processes and enabling group dynamics within training, supervision, and the programme manual.

Citing Articles

The Mellow Babies parenting programme: role of group processes and interpersonal change mechanisms.

Tanner J, Wilson P, Wight D, Thompson L Front Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025; 3():1395363.

PMID: 39816588 PMC: 11731860. DOI: 10.3389/frcha.2024.1395363.

References

Gasparrini A, Armstrong B . Reducing and meta-analysing estimates from distributed lag non-linear models. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13:1. PMC: 3599933. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-1. View

Daly D, Moran P, Wuytack F, Hannon S, Hannon K, Martin Y . The maternal health-related issues that matter most to women in Ireland as they transition to motherhood - A qualitative study. Women Birth. 2021; 35(1):e10-e18. DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.01.013. View

DeJonckheere M, Vaughn L . Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour. Fam Med Community Health. 2020; 7(2):e000057. PMC: 6910737. DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000057. View

Berry V, Melendez-Torres G, Axford N, Axberg U, Orobio de Castro B, Gardner F . Does Social and Economic Disadvantage Predict Lower Engagement with Parenting Interventions? An Integrative Analysis Using Individual Participant Data. Prev Sci. 2022; 24(8):1447-1458. PMC: 10678811. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-022-01404-1. View

Hollway W, Jefferson T . Panic and perjury: a psychosocial exploration of agency. Br J Soc Psychol. 2005; 44(Pt 2):147-63. DOI: 10.1348/014466604X18983. View

Koerting J, Smith E, Knowles M, Latter S, Elsey H, McCann D . Barriers to, and facilitators of, parenting programmes for childhood behaviour problems: a qualitative synthesis of studies of parents' and professionals' perceptions. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013; 22(11):653-70. PMC: 3826057. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-013-0401-2. View

Furlong M, McGilloway S . The Incredible Years parenting program in Ireland: a qualitative analysis of the experience of disadvantaged parents. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011; 17(4):616-30. DOI: 10.1177/1359104511426406. View

Cruwys T, Haslam S, Dingle G, Jetten J, Hornsey M, Desdemona Chong E . Feeling connected again: interventions that increase social identification reduce depression symptoms in community and clinical settings. J Affect Disord. 2014; 159:139-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.02.019. View

Postmes T, Haslam S, Jans L . A single-item measure of social identification: reliability, validity, and utility. Br J Soc Psychol. 2012; 52(4):597-617. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12006. View

Maxwell A, McMahon C, Huber A, Hawkins E, Reay R . Addressing the Evidence Gap: Protocol for an Effectiveness Study of Circle of Security Parenting, an Attachment-Based Intervention. Front Glob Womens Health. 2021; 1:575752. PMC: 8594052. DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2020.575752. View

10.

Berube A, Lafantaisie V, Dubeau D, Coutu S, Caron J, Devault A . Using implementation evaluation to uncover a child neglect prevention program. Eval Program Plann. 2014; 45:1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.03.001. View

11.

Buston K, OBrien R, Wight D, Henderson M . The reflective component of the Mellow Bumps parenting intervention: Implementation, engagement and mechanisms of change. PLoS One. 2019; 14(4):e0215461. PMC: 6467403. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215461. View

12.

Woolley A, Chabris C, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone T . Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science. 2010; 330(6004):686-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1193147. View

13.

Stone K, Burgess C . Parents' perspectives of a universal early attachment programme in Scotland. Health Promot Int. 2016; 32(6):1015-1024. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daw026. View

14.

Borek A, Abraham C, Greaves C, Tarrant M, Garner N, Pascale M . 'We're all in the same boat': A qualitative study on how groups work in a diabetes prevention and management programme. Br J Health Psychol. 2019; 24(4):787-805. DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12379. View

15.

Gale N, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S . Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13:117. PMC: 3848812. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117. View

16.

Bonell C, Jamal F, Melendez-Torres G, Cummins S . 'Dark logic': theorising the harmful consequences of public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014; 69(1):95-8. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2014-204671. View

17.

Biggs K, Hind D, Gossage-Worrall R, Sprange K, White D, Wright J . Challenges in the design, planning and implementation of trials evaluating group interventions. Trials. 2020; 21(1):116. PMC: 6990578. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3807-4. View

18.

Burlingame G, McClendon D, Alonso J . Cohesion in group therapy. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2011; 48(1):34-42. DOI: 10.1037/a0022063. View

19.

Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W . Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015; 350:h1258. PMC: 4366184. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h1258. View