» Articles » PMID: 39815187

Molecular Subtype of Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: an Analysis of 80 Chinese Patients Using the TCGA Molecular Classification of Endometrial Cancer

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2025 Jan 15
PMID 39815187
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To assess the utility of the TCGA molecular classification of endometrial cancer in a well-annotated, moderately sized, consecutive cohort of Chinese patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC).

Methods: We performed DNA sequencing on 80 OCCC patients via a panel that contains 520 cancer-related genes. The TCGA molecular subtyping method was utilized for classification. The clinicopathological features were analysed, and the survival correlation was assessed for each subtype.

Results: The most common mutated genes were ARID1A (49%) and PIK3CA (48%). No pathogenic POLE mutations were detected. MSI-high (MSI-H) tumours were observed in 5 (6.3%) patients. A total of 16.3% (13/80) of the patients were classified as the p53 abnormal (p53abn) subtype, and 77.5% (62/80) were classified as the nonspecific molecular profile (NSMP) subtype. All the MSI-H patients had ARID1A mutations, whereas patients with the p53abn subtype had the lowest percentage of ARID1A mutations (27.3%). No significant differences were observed between the molecular subtypes and clinicopathological features. The progression-free survival and overall survival of the entire cohort were closely associated with FIGO stage (p < 0.01), the presence of residual tumour (p < 0.01), and the platinum response (p < 0.01). Molecular classification did not significantly impact prognosis. Univariate analysis revealed that TP53 mutations in advanced-stage (FIGO III-IV) patients were associated with shorter survival.

Conclusions: We did not find prognostic significance of TCGA molecular subtyping in OCCC. POLEmuts are extremely rare, and the incidence of MSI-H and p53abn tumours is also quite low. Further subtyping of the NSMP subgroup is warranted.

References
1.
Gadducci A, Multinu F, Cosio S, Carinelli S, Ghioni M, Aletti G . Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: Epidemiology, pathological and biological features, treatment options and clinical outcomes. Gynecol Oncol. 2021; 162(3):741-750. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.033. View

2.
Hajkova N, Kendall Bartu M, Cibula D, Drozenova J, Fabian P, Fadare O . Microsatellite instability in non-endometrioid ovarian epithelial tumors: a study of 400 cases comparing immunohistochemistry, PCR, and NGS based testing with mutation status of MMR genes. Transl Res. 2023; 260:61-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2023.05.004. View

3.
Zhu L, Huang Y, Fang X, Liu C, Deng W, Zhong C . A Novel and Reliable Method to Detect Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer by Next-Generation Sequencing. J Mol Diagn. 2017; 20(2):225-231. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.11.007. View

4.
Long D, Waalkes A, Panicker V, Hause R, Salipante S . Identifying Optimal Loci for the Molecular Diagnosis of Microsatellite Instability. Clin Chem. 2020; 66(10):1310-1318. PMC: 7528407. DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa177. View

5.
Ye S, Zhou S, Wu Y, Pei X, Jiang W, Shi W . Genomic profiling of ovarian clear cell carcinoma in Chinese patients reveals potential prognostic biomarkers for survival. Ann Med. 2023; 55(1):2218104. PMC: 10243386. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2218104. View