» Articles » PMID: 39814865

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Eribulin Versus Dacarbazine in Patients with Advanced Liposarcoma

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Date 2025 Jan 15
PMID 39814865
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A subgroup analysis of a randomized study demonstrated that patients with advanced or metastatic liposarcoma treated with eribulin had longer overall survival and progression-free survival compared to those treated with dacarbazine, suggesting eribulin as a therapeutic option for advanced liposarcoma. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of eribulin versus dacarbazine in the treatment of advanced liposarcoma. We established a 10-year Markov model to compare the cost-effectiveness of eribulin and dacarbazine regimens. Clinical data were sourced from a subgroup analysis of a multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 3 trials. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were computed. The total cost of the dacarbazine scheme was $10,895.558, with a QALY of 0.533. In contrast, the total cost of the eribulin scheme was $16,961.891, with a QALY of 0.698. The ICER between the eribulin and dacarbazine schemes was $36,736.467, which is below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold in China ($37,877.469). From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, eribulin is cost-effective compared to dacarbazine at the WTP threshold.

References
1.
Delea T, Amdahl J, Nakhaipour H, Manson S, Wang A, Fedor N . Cost-effectiveness of pazopanib in advanced soft-tissue sarcoma in Canada. Curr Oncol. 2014; 21(6):e748-59. PMC: 4257119. DOI: 10.3747/co.21.1899. View

2.
Eichler H, Kong S, Gerth W, Mavros P, Jonsson B . Use of cost-effectiveness analysis in health-care resource allocation decision-making: how are cost-effectiveness thresholds expected to emerge?. Value Health. 2004; 7(5):518-28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.75003.x. View

3.
Lin J, Fang Q, Zheng X . Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in China. PLoS One. 2023; 18(2):e0281402. PMC: 9904460. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281402. View

4.
Amdahl J, Manson S, Isbell R, Chit A, Diaz J, Lewis L . Cost-effectiveness of pazopanib in advanced soft tissue sarcoma in the United kingdom. Sarcoma. 2014; 2014:481071. PMC: 4082932. DOI: 10.1155/2014/481071. View

5.
Santoro A, Tursz T, Mouridsen H, Verweij J, Steward W, Somers R . Doxorubicin versus CYVADIC versus doxorubicin plus ifosfamide in first-line treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. J Clin Oncol. 1995; 13(7):1537-45. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.7.1537. View