» Articles » PMID: 39814810

Cause and Consequences of Common Snook (Centropomus Undecimalis) Space Use Specialization in a Subtropical Riverscape

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Date 2025 Jan 15
PMID 39814810
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Variability in space use among conspecifics can emerge from foraging strategies that track available resources, especially in riverscapes that promote high synchrony between prey pulses and consumers. Projected changes in riverscape hydrological regimes due to water management and climate change accentuate the need to understand the natural variability in animal space use and its implications for population dynamics and ecosystem function. Here, we used long-term tracking of Common Snook (Centropomus undecimalis) movement and trophic dynamics in the Shark River, Everglades National Park from 2012 to 2023 to test how specialization in the space use of individuals (i.e., E) changes seasonally, how it is influenced by yearly hydrological conditions, and its relationship to the between individual trophic niche. Snook exhibited seasonal variability in space use, with maximum individual specialization (high dissimilarity) in the wet season. The degree of individual specialization increased over the years in association with greater marsh flooding duration, which produced important subsidies. Also, there were threshold responses of individual space use specialization as a function of floodplain conditions. Greater specialization in space use results in a decrease in snook trophic niche size. These results show how hydrological regimes in riverscapes influence individual specialization of resource use (both space and prey), providing insight into how forecasted hydroclimatic scenarios may shape habitat selection processes and the trophic dynamics of mobile consumers.

References
1.
Mccary M, Phillips J, Ramiadantsoa T, Nell L, McCormick A, Botsch J . Transient top-down and bottom-up effects of resources pulsed to multiple trophic levels. Ecology. 2020; 102(1):e03197. DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3197. View

2.
Abrahms B, Aikens E, Armstrong J, Deacy W, Kauffman M, Merkle J . Emerging Perspectives on Resource Tracking and Animal Movement Ecology. Trends Ecol Evol. 2020; 36(4):308-320. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.10.018. View

3.
Riotte-Lambert L, Matthiopoulos J . Environmental Predictability as a Cause and Consequence of Animal Movement. Trends Ecol Evol. 2019; 35(2):163-174. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.09.009. View

4.
Del Mar Delgado M, Miranda M, Alvarez S, Gurarie E, Fagan W, Penteriani V . The importance of individual variation in the dynamics of animal collective movements. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018; 373(1746). PMC: 5882978. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0008. View

5.
Van Moorter B, Rolandsen C, Basille M, Gaillard J . Movement is the glue connecting home ranges and habitat selection. J Anim Ecol. 2015; 85(1):21-31. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12394. View