CLINTERVENTIONAL Protocol: a Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Clinical Consultations and Audiovisual Tools for Interventional Radiology

Overview

Journal Eur Radiol Exp

Date 2025 Jan 15

PMID 39812733

Authors

Pedro Blas Garcia Jurado

Juan Jose Espejo Herrero

Maria Sagrario Lombardo Galera

Maria Eugenia Perez Montilla

Sara Barranco Acosta

Jose Garcia-Revillo

Pilar Font Ugalde

Marina Alvarez Benito

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Trial Registration: NCT05461482 at clinicaltrials.gov.

Relevance Statement: This randomized controlled trial will assess the impact of clinical consultations and explanatory audiovisual tools on patient understanding, satisfaction, and anxiety in interventional radiology. The findings could help establish a more proactive clinical role for interventional radiologists and improve the overall quality of patient-centered care.

Key Points: We describe the protocol of an interventional radiology randomized clinical trial. The control group will receive procedure information from the referring physician and the experimental group receives additional consultation with interventionalists and views a video. Knowledge, satisfaction with information, and patient anxiety will be evaluated. This study will provide insights about the benefits of consultations and videos in interventional radiology.

References

Moore A, Howlett J, Phull M, Mpungose L, Samson S . Does the use of video improve patient satisfaction in the consent process for local-anaesthetic urological procedures?. Int Urol Nephrol. 2021; 53(6):1051-1057. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02770-x. View

Morgan R, Patel P, Binkert C, Tam A . Global Statement Defining Interventional Radiology-Have We Reached the Tipping Point?. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024; 47(11):1433-1438. PMC: 11761823. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-024-03852-4. View

Mahnken A, Seoane E, Cannavale A, de Haan M, Dezman R, Kloeckner R . CIRSE Clinical Practice Manual. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021; 44(9):1323-1353. PMC: 8382634. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-021-02904-3. View

Pallett A, Nguyen B, Klein N, Phippen N, Miller C, Barnett J . A randomized controlled trial to determine whether a video presentation improves informed consent for hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 219(3):277.e1-277.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.06.016. View

Glaser J, Nouri S, Fernandez A, Sudore R, Schillinger D, Klein-Fedyshin M . Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review. Med Decis Making. 2020; 40(2):119-143. PMC: 7079202. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X19896348. View

Rosenkrantz A, Rawson J . Trends in Publications in Radiology Journals Designated as Relating to Patient-Centered Care. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016; 14(5):703-709. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.09.016. View

Heft M, Wong K, James C, Lewis P, Hicks E, Jensen H . Establishing a pediatric interventional radiology inpatient consult service. Pediatr Radiol. 2023; 53(9):1951-1960. PMC: 10164614. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-023-05664-z. View

Yap J, Teo T, Foong P, Binte Hussin N, Wang H, Shen T . A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of a portable patient education video prior to coronary angiography and angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 96(7):1409-1414. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28655. View

Lin Y, Chen C, Lee W, Cheng Y, Lin T, Lin C . Educational video-assisted versus conventional informed consent for trauma-related debridement surgery: a parallel group randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Ethics. 2018; 19(1):23. PMC: 5845218. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-018-0264-7. View

10.

Cazzato R, De Rubeis G, De Marini P, Auloge P, Dalili D, Weiss J . Interventional Radiology Outpatient Clinics (IROC): Clinical Impact and Patient Satisfaction. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020; 44(1):118-126. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-020-02677-1. View

11.

Zener R, Demers V, Bilodeau A, Benko A, Abraham R, Wong J . Clinical IR in Canada: The Evolution of a Revolution. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018; 29(4):524-530.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.11.031. View

12.

Almansour H, Li N, Murphy M, Healy G . Interventional Radiology Training: International Variations. Radiology. 2023; 308(1):e230040. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.230040. View

13.

. Patient survey of value in relation to radiology: results from a survey of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) value-based radiology subcommittee. Insights Imaging. 2021; 12(1):6. PMC: 7790952. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-020-00943-x. View

14.

Murphy T . Clinical interventional radiology: serving the patient. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003; 14(4):401-3. DOI: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000064850.87207.99. View

15.

Maingard J, Kok H, Ranatunga D, Brooks D, Chandra R, Lee M . The future of interventional and neurointerventional radiology: learning lessons from the past. Br J Radiol. 2017; 90(1080):20170473. PMC: 6047642. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170473. View

16.

Makris G, Uberoi R . Interventional Radiology-The Future: Evolution or Extinction?. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016; 39(12):1789-1790. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-016-1450-y. View

17.

Lopera J, Vrachliotis T, Thompson S . Updates and New Frontiers in Interventional Radiology The 2022 Monograph Issue. Radiographics. 2022; 42(6):1577-1578. DOI: 10.1148/rg.220187. View

18.

Lutjeboer J, Burgmans M, Chung K, van Erkel A . Impact on Patient Safety and Satisfaction of Implementation of an Outpatient Clinic in Interventional Radiology (IPSIPOLI-Study): A Quasi-Experimental Prospective Study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015; 38(3):543-51. PMC: 4422862. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-015-1069-4. View

19.

Al-Kutoubi A . Admission privileges and clinical responsibilities for interventional radiologists. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014; 38(2):257-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-014-1006-y. View

20.

Trivedi P, Guerra B, Kumar V, Akinwande G, West D, Abi-Jaoudeh N . Healthcare Disparities in Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2022; 33(12):1459-1467.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.08.026. View