» Articles » PMID: 39811804

From a Bee's Eye: Effects of UV Bullseye Size on Reproductive Success in a Dioecious Vine (Cucurbitaceae)

Overview
Journal Plant Divers
Date 2025 Jan 15
PMID 39811804
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Descriptions of floral traits based on the visual capabilities of pollinators would advance our understanding of flower evolution and plant-pollinator relationships. One such trait is the contrasting UV bullseye color pattern, which is invisible to human eyes but can be perceived by bee pollinators. However, it remains largely unknown how UV bullseye size affects male and female reproductive fitness. We examined UV bullseye patterns in the dioecious , and quantified the effects of UV bullseye size on male and female fitness. Both UV bullseye size and flower size were larger in male flowers than in female flowers. The dominant pollinators of were bees, which could perceive the UV bullseye pattern. Bee pollinators exhibited a preference for male flowers with nectar rewards, and visited a greater number of male flowers on plants with a larger UV bullseye. Male reproductive fitness was found to decrease in plants with larger UV bullseyes, likely due to the high rate of intra-plant pollen transfer. Rewardless female flowers were less attractive to bee pollinators, resulting in pollen limitation of seed production. Female flowers with moderate UV bullseye size produced more seeds. Our results suggest that UV bullseye is subject to different selection via male and female fitness of with deceptive pollination, and large UV bullseye is generally not favored. This research is the first to examine the relationship between UV bullseye size and plant reproductive success, highlighting that floral evolution should be investigated from the pollinator's eye in future research.

References
1.
Huang S, Tang L, Sun J, Lu Y . Pollinator response to female and male floral display in a monoecious species and its implications for the evolution of floral dimorphism. New Phytol. 2006; 171(2):417-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01766.x. View

2.
Peitsch D, Fietz A, Hertel H, de Souza J, Ventura D, Menzel R . The spectral input systems of hymenopteran insects and their receptor-based colour vision. J Comp Physiol A. 1992; 170(1):23-40. DOI: 10.1007/BF00190398. View

3.
Liao W, Hu Y, Zhu B, Zhao X, Zeng Y, Zhang D . Female reproductive success decreases with display size in monkshood, Aconitum kusnezoffii (Ranunculaceae). Ann Bot. 2009; 104(7):1405-12. PMC: 2778385. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcp237. View

4.
Chen Z, Niu Y, Liu C, Sun H . Red flowers differ in shades between pollination systems and across continents. Ann Bot. 2020; 126(5):837-848. PMC: 7539362. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcaa103. View

5.
Tunes P, Camargo M, Guimaraes E . Floral UV Features of Plant Species From a Neotropical Savanna. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:618028. PMC: 8137824. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.618028. View