» Articles » PMID: 39811547

Clinical Improvements After Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction with Valves in Patients with Advanced Emphysema and a 6-min Walk Test ≤140 m at Baseline

Abstract

Background: Data regarding the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic lung volume reduction with valves (ELVR) in emphysema patients with a very low 6-min walk test (6MWT) are limited. Patients with severe emphysema and very low exercise capacity, as indicated by a 6MWT ≤140 m, are often excluded from clinical studies on ELVR, assuming limited therapeutic benefits and increased complication risk.

Study Designs And Methods: This study utilised data from the Lungenemphysemregister e.V., a large German national multi-centre prospective open-label clinical trial, and aimed to assess the outcomes of ELVR in patients with a baseline 6MWT ≤140 m and dyspnoea primarily attributed to hyperinflation.

Results: 54 patients with a baseline 6MWT ≤140 m and 365 patients with a baseline 6MWT between 140 and 450 m were included in the study. Baseline characteristics were representative for patients with advanced lung emphysema. Patients with a 6MWT ≤140 m at baseline had a lower forced expiratory volume in 1 s and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide and higher symptom burden. In the 3-month follow-up, patients of both groups showed statistically significant improvements in lung function parameters, exercise capacity and quality of life parameters compared to baseline. Patients with a 6MWT ≤140 m at baseline showed significantly more 6MWT improvement compared to patients with baseline 6MWT between 140 and 450 m. Moreover, complication rates were similar in both groups.

Interpretation: In summary, the data indicate that ELVR may be an effective and safe treatment for emphysema patients with a very low 6MWT of ≤140 m if very limited exercise capacity is predominately caused by lung emphysema. Therefore future studies should include emphysema patients with a very low 6MWT.

References
1.
Sgarbossa T, Lenga P, Stanzel F, Holland A, Grah C, Gesierich W . Assessment of efficacy and safety of endoscopic lung volume reduction with one-way valves in patients with a very low FEV. ERJ Open Res. 2023; 9(4). PMC: 10440652. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00190-2023. View

2.
Lenga P, Ruwwe-Glosenkamp C, Grah C, Pfannschmidt J, Ruckert J, Eggeling S . Endoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves in very low patients: results from the German Registry - Lungenemphysemregister e.V. ERJ Open Res. 2021; 7(1). PMC: 7836438. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00449-2020. View

3.
. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002; 166(1):111-7. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102. View

4.
Puhan M, Chandra D, Mosenifar Z, Ries A, Make B, Hansel N . The minimal important difference of exercise tests in severe COPD. Eur Respir J. 2010; 37(4):784-90. PMC: 5516638. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00063810. View

5.
Herth F, Valipour A, Shah P, Eberhardt R, Grah C, Egan J . Segmental volume reduction using thermal vapour ablation in patients with severe emphysema: 6-month results of the multicentre, parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled STEP-UP trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2016; 4(3):185-93. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)00045-X. View