» Articles » PMID: 39808225

The Predictive Power of F-FDG PET/CT Two-lesions Radiomics and Conventional Models in Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma: a Comparative Retrospectively-validated Study

Overview
Journal Ann Hematol
Date 2025 Jan 14
PMID 39808225
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In a previous preliminary study, radiomic features from the largest and the hottest lesion in baseline F-FDG PET/CT (bPET/CT) of classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma (cHL) predicted early response-to-treatment and prognosis. Aim of this large retrospectively-validated study is to evaluate the predictive role of two-lesions radiomics in comparison with other clinical and conventional PET/CT models. cHL patients with bPET/CT between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively included and randomized into training-validation sets. Target lesions were: Lesion_A, with largest axial diameter (D); Lesion_B, with highest SUV. Total-metabolic-tumor-volume (TMTV) was calculated and 212 radiomic features were extracted. PET/CT features were harmonized using ComBat across two scanners. Outcomes were progression-free-survival (PFS) and Deauville Score at interim PET/CT (DS). For each outcome, three predictive models and their combinations were trained and validated: - radiomic model "R"; - conventional PET/CT model "P"; - clinical model "C". 197 patients were included (training = 118; validation = 79): 38/197 (19%) patients had adverse events and 42/193 (22%) had DS ≥ 4. In the training phase, only one radiomic feature was selected for PFS prediction in model "R" (Lesion_B F_cm.corr, C-index 66.9%). Best "C" model combined stage and IPS (C-index 74.8%), while optimal "P" model combined TMTV and D (C-index 63.3%). After internal validation, "C", "C + R", "R + P" and "C + R + P" significantly predicted PFS. The best validated model was "C + R" (C-index 66.3%). No model was validated for DS prediction. In this large retrospectively-validated study, a combination of baseline F-FDG PET/CT two-lesions radiomics and other conventional models showed an added prognostic power in patients with cHL. As single models, conventional clinical parameters maintain their prognostic power, while radiomics or conventional PET/CT alone seem to be sub-optimal to predict survival.

References
1.
Weber W . Assessing tumor response to therapy. J Nucl Med. 2009; 50 Suppl 1:1S-10S. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057174. View

2.
Dean E, Mhaskar R, Lu H, Mousa M, Krivenko G, Lazaryan A . High metabolic tumor volume is associated with decreased efficacy of axicabtagene ciloleucel in large B-cell lymphoma. Blood Adv. 2020; 4(14):3268-3276. PMC: 7391155. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001900. View

3.
Lippi M, Gianotti S, Fama A, Casali M, Barbolini E, Ferrari A . Texture analysis and multiple-instance learning for the classification of malignant lymphomas. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019; 185:105153. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105153. View

4.
Lue K, Wu Y, Liu S, Hsieh T, Chuang K, Lin H . Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Radiomic Features of 18F-FDG PET in Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2019; 44(10):e559-e565. DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000002732. View

5.
Dibble E, Alvarez A, Truong M, Mercier G, Cook E, Subramaniam R . 18F-FDG metabolic tumor volume and total glycolytic activity of oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer: adding value to clinical staging. J Nucl Med. 2012; 53(5):709-15. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.099531. View