» Articles » PMID: 39808215

The Fate of the Rectum in Ulcerative Colitis at Index Surgery and Beyond-a Contemporary Cohort

Overview
Date 2025 Jan 14
PMID 39808215
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Proctectomy is frequently deferred at index colectomy for ulcerative colitis due to acuity or immunosuppressive treatments. The retained rectum remains symptomatic in over 50% with associated cancer risk. Management options include index or delayed proctectomy with or without restoration of continuity or surveillance. Comparative studies of perioperative outcomes and reasons for retaining the rectum are lacking.

Methods: This 13-year retrospective cohort assesses the fate of the rectum in 168 ulcerative colitis patients by analysing index proctectomy, staged proctectomy and retained rectal remnant determinants and outcomes. The primary outcome was the fate of the rectum. Secondary analysis included perioperative morbidity, length of stay and decision-making determinants.

Results: Proctectomy was performed in 69% of patients, with 16.1% at index surgery. Restorative surgery rate was 44%. Index proctectomy patients were older (54 vs 37 years, p < 0.01), more co-morbid (59.3% vs 38.2%, p = 0.04) and likely to have elective surgery (81.5% vs 21.3%, p < 0.01) or neoplasia (33.3% vs 1.1%, p < 0.01). Outcomes after staged proctectomy were comparable, with age influencing restoration of continuity (33.5 vs 46 years, p < 0.01). Younger patients were indecisive on proctectomy, while those opting for endoscopic surveillance were older (median 65 years, p < 0.01), had more complications (64.3%, p = 0.23) and prolonged hospitalisation (median 15 days, p = 0.02) at colectomy.

Conclusions: Index proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis is infrequently performed. Perioperative outcomes of restorative and non-restorative staged proctectomy are comparable. Perioperative experience at colectomy may influence patient decisions regarding future management of their rectum.

References
1.
Spinelli A, Bonovas S, Burisch J, Kucharzik T, Adamina M, Annese V . ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Surgical Treatment. J Crohns Colitis. 2021; 16(2):179-189. DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab177. View

2.
Juviler A, Hyman N . Ulcerative colitis: the fate of the retained rectum. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2009; 17(1):29-34. PMC: 2780074. DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-823068. View

3.
Buchs N, Bloemendaal A, Wood C, Travis S, Mortensen N, Guy R . Subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis: lessons learned from a tertiary centre. Colorectal Dis. 2017; 19(5):O153-O161. DOI: 10.1111/codi.13658. View

4.
Georganta I, McIntosh S, Boldovjakova D, Parnaby C, Watson A, Ramsay G . The incidence of malignancy in the residual rectum of IBD patients after colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol. 2023; 27(9):699-712. PMC: 10404177. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02762-w. View

5.
Beyer-Berjot L, Maggiori L, Birnbaum D, Lefevre J, Berdah S, Panis Y . A total laparoscopic approach reduces the infertility rate after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a 2-center study. Ann Surg. 2013; 258(2):275-82. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182813741. View