Critical Considerations and Computational Tools in Plant Genome Editing

Overview

Journal Heliyon

Date 2025 Jan 14

PMID 39807514

Authors

Dipnarayan Saha

Alok Kumar Panda

Subhojit Datta

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Recent advances in genome editing tools and CRISPR-Cas technologies have enabled plant genome engineering reach new heights. The current regulatory exemptions for certain categories of genome edited products, such as those derived from SDN-1 and SDN-2, which are free of any transgene, have significantly accelerated genome editing research in a number of agricultural crop plants in different countries. Although CRISPR-Cas technology is becoming increasingly popular, it is still important to carefully consider a number of factors before planning and carrying conducting CRISPR-Cas studies. To attempt genome editing in a plant, a high-quality genome sequence and a repeatable tissue culture protocol for in vitro regeneration are essential. One of the most important steps in plant genome editing is the designing of a CRISPR construct, which involves selecting the appropriate Cas protein, sgRNA sequence, and appropriate regulatory sequence to trigger expression. Computational tools and algorithms play a crucial role in construct design and gRNA selection to minimize off-target effects and also to optimize their delivery techniques. Researchers may need to select appropriate software tools capable of analyzing post-editing detection of mutation events and other DNA sequence abnormalities to identify off-target effects. To fully fulfill the potential of plant genome editing, continued advances in computational biology are essential to meet the challenges it faces today.

References

Bhattacharjee S, Bhowmick R, Kant L, Paul K . Strategic transgene-free approaches of CRISPR-based genome editing in plants. Mol Genet Genomics. 2023; 298(3):507-520. PMC: 9958309. DOI: 10.1007/s00438-023-01998-3. View

Pan C, Li G, Malzahn A, Cheng Y, Leyson B, Sretenovic S . Boosting plant genome editing with a versatile CRISPR-Combo system. Nat Plants. 2022; 8(5):513-525. DOI: 10.1038/s41477-022-01151-9. View

Martinez M . Computational Tools for Genomic Studies in Plants. Curr Genomics. 2017; 17(6):509-514. PMC: 5282602. DOI: 10.2174/1389202917666160520103447. View

Chen K, Wang Y, Zhang R, Zhang H, Gao C . CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing and Precision Plant Breeding in Agriculture. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2019; 70:667-697. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100049. View

Karvelis T, Gasiunas G, Young J, Bigelyte G, Silanskas A, Cigan M . Rapid characterization of CRISPR-Cas9 protospacer adjacent motif sequence elements. Genome Biol. 2015; 16:253. PMC: 4653880. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-015-0818-7. View

Ni P, Zhao Y, Zhou X, Liu Z, Huang Z, Ni Z . Efficient and versatile multiplex prime editing in hexaploid wheat. Genome Biol. 2023; 24(1):156. PMC: 10308706. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-023-02990-1. View

Adli M . The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):1911. PMC: 5953931. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04252-2. View

Tyurin A, Suhorukova A, Kabardaeva K, Goldenkova-Pavlova I . Transient Gene Expression is an Effective Experimental Tool for the Research into the Fine Mechanisms of Plant Gene Function: Advantages, Limitations, and Solutions. Plants (Basel). 2020; 9(9). PMC: 7569937. DOI: 10.3390/plants9091187. View

Kelley M, Strezoska Z, He K, Vermeulen A, van Brabant Smith A . Versatility of chemically synthesized guide RNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. J Biotechnol. 2016; 233:74-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.06.011. View

10.

Graham N, Patil G, Bubeck D, Dobert R, Glenn K, Gutsche A . Plant Genome Editing and the Relevance of Off-Target Changes. Plant Physiol. 2020; 183(4):1453-1471. PMC: 7401131. DOI: 10.1104/pp.19.01194. View

11.

Gu X, Liu L, Zhang H . Transgene-free Genome Editing in Plants. Front Genome Ed. 2021; 3:805317. PMC: 8678605. DOI: 10.3389/fgeed.2021.805317. View

12.

Han Y, Broughton S, Liu L, Zhang X, Zeng J, He X . Highly efficient and genotype-independent barley gene editing based on anther culture. Plant Commun. 2021; 2(2):100082. PMC: 8060703. DOI: 10.1016/j.xplc.2020.100082. View

13.

Heigwer F, Kerr G, Boutros M . E-CRISP: fast CRISPR target site identification. Nat Methods. 2014; 11(2):122-3. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2812. View

14.

Hille F, Charpentier E . CRISPR-Cas: biology, mechanisms and relevance. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016; 371(1707). PMC: 5052741. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0496. View

15.

Braatz J, Harloff H, Mascher M, Stein N, Himmelbach A, Jung C . CRISPR-Cas9 Targeted Mutagenesis Leads to Simultaneous Modification of Different Homoeologous Gene Copies in Polyploid Oilseed Rape (). Plant Physiol. 2017; 174(2):935-942. PMC: 5462057. DOI: 10.1104/pp.17.00426. View

16.

Hesami M, Alizadeh M, Naderi R, Tohidfar M . Forecasting and optimizing Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation via ensemble model- fruit fly optimization algorithm: A data mining approach using chrysanthemum databases. PLoS One. 2020; 15(9):e0239901. PMC: 7526930. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239901. View

17.

Sledzinski P, Nowaczyk M, Olejniczak M . Computational Tools and Resources Supporting CRISPR-Cas Experiments. Cells. 2020; 9(5). PMC: 7290941. DOI: 10.3390/cells9051288. View

18.

Van Eck J . Applying gene editing to tailor precise genetic modifications in plants. J Biol Chem. 2020; 295(38):13267-13276. PMC: 7504920. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.REV120.010850. View

19.

Wong N, Liu W, Wang X . WU-CRISPR: characteristics of functional guide RNAs for the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Genome Biol. 2015; 16:218. PMC: 4629399. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-015-0784-0. View

20.

Minkenberg B, Zhang J, Xie K, Yang Y . CRISPR-PLANT v2: an online resource for highly specific guide RNA spacers based on improved off-target analysis. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018; 17(1):5-8. PMC: 6330547. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13025. View