Self-advocacy Positive Perceptions and Stage Experiences in Patients Who Had a Stroke: a Qualitative Study in China

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Date 2025 Jan 14

PMID 39806670

Authors

Zhixin Zhao

Xiaoxuan Wang

Chunhui Zhang

Shanshan Wang

Zhen-Xiang Zhang

Bei-Lei Lin

Yong-Xia Mei

Hu Jiang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: This study explored the perceptions and experiences of self-advocacy among patients who had a stroke in China.

Design: A descriptive phenomenological qualitative study was performed. Colaizzi's seven-step method was used to analyse the data.

Setting: Two hospitals in Zhengzhou and Luoyang City, Henan Province, China.

Participants: 19 patients who had a stroke were recruited and interviewed face-to-face between October 2023 and February 2024.

Results: The findings revealed two categories: positive perceptions and stage experiences. Three themes of positive perceptions were extracted: 'accept the facts of illness while maintaining inner integrity' with three subthemes (disease cognition, firm faith and positive attitude); 'clarify one's own needs and strive for them' with four subthemes (self-care knowledge, effective communication, independent decision-making and power from relation); 'enhancing subjective initiative and maintaining healthy behaviours' with three subthemes (active participant in disease management, increased treatment compliance and increased initiative in rehabilitation exercises). Three stage experiences themes were motivation, response and stabilisation stage.

Conclusions: In this study, patients who had a stroke showed more positive perceptions of self-advocacy. Self-advocacy is a dynamic and progressive process of accepting their disease and actively participating in disease treatment. In addition, patients' health behaviours are improved and maintained when they engage in self-advocacy.

References

Wittal D . Bridging the gap from the oncology setting to community care through a cross-Canada environmental scan. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2019; 28(1):38-45. PMC: 6516218. DOI: 10.5737/236880762813845. View

Francis J, Johnston M, Robertson C, Glidewell L, Entwistle V, Eccles M . What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health. 2010; 25(10):1229-45. DOI: 10.1080/08870440903194015. View

Bulsara C, Ward A, Joske D . Haematological cancer patients: achieving a sense of empowerment by use of strategies to control illness. J Clin Nurs. 2004; 13(2):251-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00886.x. View

Leung S, Chan C, Shah S . Development of a Chinese version of the Modified Barthel Index-- validity and reliability. Clin Rehabil. 2007; 21(10):912-22. DOI: 10.1177/0269215507077286. View

Ciccone M, Aquilino A, Cortese F, Scicchitano P, Sassara M, Mola E . Feasibility and effectiveness of a disease and care management model in the primary health care system for patients with heart failure and diabetes (Project Leonardo). Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010; 6:297-305. PMC: 2868351. DOI: 10.2147/vhrm.s9252. View

Thomas T, Donovan H, Rosenzweig M, Bender C, Schenker Y . A Conceptual Framework of Self-advocacy in Women With Cancer. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2020; 44(1):E1-E13. PMC: 7894983. DOI: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000342. View

Hagan T, Donovan H . Ovarian cancer survivors' experiences of self-advocacy: a focus group study. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013; 40(2):140-7. PMC: 4021021. DOI: 10.1188/13.ONF.A12-A19. View

Brashers D, Basinger E, Rintamaki L, Caughlin J, Para M . Taking Control: The Efficacy and Durability of a Peer-Led Uncertainty Management Intervention for People Recently Diagnosed With HIV. Health Commun. 2016; 32(1):11-21. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2015.1089469. View

Pickett S, Diehl S, Steigman P, Prater J, Fox A, Shipley P . Consumer empowerment and self-advocacy outcomes in a randomized study of peer-led education. Community Ment Health J. 2012; 48(4):420-30. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-012-9507-0. View

10.

Schober G, Wenger J, Lee C, Oberlander J, Flythe J . Dialysis Patient Perspectives on CKD Advocacy: A Semistructured Interview Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016; 69(1):29-40. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.06.018. View

11.

Tilley E, Strnadova I, Danker J, Walmsley J, Loblinzk J . The impact of self-advocacy organizations on the subjective well-being of people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review of the literature. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020; 33(6):1151-1165. DOI: 10.1111/jar.12752. View

12.

Aujoulat I, Dhoore W, Deccache A . Patient empowerment in theory and practice: polysemy or cacophony?. Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 66(1):13-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.008. View

13.

Hagan T, Donovan H . Self-advocacy and cancer: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2013; 69(10):2348-59. PMC: 3640735. DOI: 10.1111/jan.12084. View

14.

Bodenheimer T, Wagner E, Grumbach K . Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA. 2002; 288(14):1775-9. DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1775. View

15.

Doyle L, McCabe C, Keogh B, Brady A, McCann M . An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. J Res Nurs. 2021; 25(5):443-455. PMC: 7932381. DOI: 10.1177/1744987119880234. View

16.

Lim N, Shorey S . Effectiveness of technology-based educational interventions on the empowerment related outcomes of children and young adults with cancer: A quantitative systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2019; 75(10):2072-2084. DOI: 10.1111/jan.13974. View

17.

Shay L, Lafata J . Understanding patient perceptions of shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2014; 96(3):295-301. PMC: 4241759. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.017. View

18.

DeMarco R, Chan K . The Sistah Powah structured writing intervention: a feasibility study for aging, low-income, HIV-positive Black women. Am J Health Promot. 2013; 28(2):108-18. DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.120227-QUAN-115. View

19.

Feigin V, Owolabi M . Pragmatic solutions to reduce the global burden of stroke: a World Stroke Organization-Lancet Neurology Commission. Lancet Neurol. 2023; 22(12):1160-1206. PMC: 10715732. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00277-6. View

20.

Michael R, Zidan H . Differences in self-advocacy among hard of hearing and typical hearing students. Res Dev Disabil. 2017; 72:118-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.11.005. View