» Articles » PMID: 39803703

The Enzyme Effect: Broadening the Horizon of MS Optimization to Nontryptic Digestion in Proteomics

Overview
Date 2025 Jan 13
PMID 39803703
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent years, alternative enzymes with varied specificities have gained importance in MS-based bottom-up proteomics, offering orthogonal information about biological samples and advantages in certain applications. However, most mass spectrometric workflows are optimized for tryptic digests. This raises the questions of whether enzyme specificity impacts mass spectrometry and if current methods for nontryptic digests are suboptimal. The success of peptide and protein identifications relies on the information content of MS/MS spectra, influenced by collision energy in collision-induced dissociation. We investigated this by conducting LC-MS/MS measurements with different enzymes, including trypsin, Arg-C, Glu-C, Asp-N, and chymotrypsin, at varying collision energies. We analyzed peptide scores for thousands of peptides and determined optimal collision energy (CE) values. Our results showed a linear / dependence for all enzymes, with Glu-C, Asp-N, and chymotrypsin requiring significantly lower energies than trypsin and Arg-C. We proposed a tailored CE selection method for these alternative enzymes, applying ca. 20% lower energy compared to tryptic peptides. This would result in a 10-15 eV decrease on a Bruker QTof instrument and a 5-6 NCE% (normalized collision energy) difference on an Orbitrap. The optimized method improved bottom-up proteomics performance by 8-32%, as measured by peptide identification and sequence coverage. The different trends in fragmentation behavior were linked to the effects of C-terminal basic amino acids for Arg-C and trypsin, stabilizing y fragment ions. This optimized method boosts the performance and provides insight into the impact of enzyme specificity. Data sets are available in the MassIVE repository (MSV000095066).

References
1.
Revesz A, Hever H, Steckel A, Schlosser G, Szabo D, Vekey K . Collision energies: Optimization strategies for bottom-up proteomics. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2021; 42(4):1261-1299. DOI: 10.1002/mas.21763. View

2.
Dau T, Bartolomucci G, Rappsilber J . Proteomics Using Protease Alternatives to Trypsin Benefits from Sequential Digestion with Trypsin. Anal Chem. 2020; 92(14):9523-9527. PMC: 7377536. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00478. View

3.
Revesz A, Rokob T, Jeanne Dit Fouque D, Huse D, Hada V, Turiak L . Optimal Collision Energies and Bioinformatics Tools for Efficient Bottom-up Sequence Validation of Monoclonal Antibodies. Anal Chem. 2019; 91(20):13128-13135. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b03362. View

4.
Nagy K, Gellen G, Papp D, Schlosser G, Revesz A . Optimum collision energies for proteomics: The impact of ion mobility separation. J Mass Spectrom. 2023; 58(9):e4957. DOI: 10.1002/jms.4957. View

5.
Perkins D, Pappin D, Creasy D, Cottrell J . Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis. 1999; 20(18):3551-67. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19991201)20:18<3551::AID-ELPS3551>3.0.CO;2-2. View