Flexibility in PAM Recognition Expands DNA Targeting in XCas9

Overview

Journal bioRxiv

Date 2025 Jan 13

PMID 39803448

Authors

Kazi A Hossain

Lukasz Nierzwicki

Modesto Orozco

Jacek Czub

Giulia Palermo

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

xCas9 is an evolved variant of the CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing system, engineered to improve specificity and reduce undesired off-target effects. How xCas9 expands the DNA targeting capability of Cas9 by recognizing a series of alternative Protospacer Adjacent Motif (PAM) sequences while ignoring others is unknown. Here, we elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying xCas9's expanded PAM recognition and provide critical insights for expanding DNA targeting. We demonstrate that while wild-type Cas9 enforces stringent guanine selection through the rigidity of its interacting arginine dyad, xCas9 introduces flexibility in R1335, enabling selective recognition of specific PAM sequences. This increased flexibility confers a pronounced entropic preference, which also improves recognition of the canonical TGG PAM. Furthermore, xCas9 enhances DNA binding to alternative PAM sequences during the early evolution cycles, while favouring binding to the canonical PAM in the final evolution cycle. This dual functionality highlights how xCas9 broadens PAM recognition and underscores the importance of fine-tuning the flexibility of the PAM-interacting cleft as a key strategy for expanding the DNA targeting potential of CRISPR-Cas systems. These findings deepen our understanding of DNA recognition in xCas9 and may apply to other CRISPR-Cas systems with similar PAM recognition requirements.

References

Hossain K, Kogut M, Slabonska J, Sappati S, Wieczor M, Czub J . How acidic amino acid residues facilitate DNA target site selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(3):e2212501120. PMC: 9934023. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2212501120. View

Sternberg S, LaFrance B, Kaplan M, Doudna J . Conformational control of DNA target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9. Nature. 2015; 527(7576):110-3. PMC: 4859810. DOI: 10.1038/nature15544. View

Klimovich P, Shirts M, Mobley D . Guidelines for the analysis of free energy calculations. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2015; 29(5):397-411. PMC: 4420631. DOI: 10.1007/s10822-015-9840-9. View

Anders C, Niewoehner O, Duerst A, Jinek M . Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nature. 2014; 513(7519):569-73. PMC: 4176945. DOI: 10.1038/nature13579. View

Luscombe N, Laskowski R, Thornton J . Amino acid-base interactions: a three-dimensional analysis of protein-DNA interactions at an atomic level. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29(13):2860-74. PMC: 55782. DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.13.2860. View

Gapsys V, de Groot B . pmx Webserver: A User Friendly Interface for Alchemistry. J Chem Inf Model. 2017; 57(2):109-114. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00498. View

Laio A, Parrinello M . Escaping free-energy minima. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(20):12562-6. PMC: 130499. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.202427399. View

Wang X, Minasov G, Shoichet B . Evolution of an antibiotic resistance enzyme constrained by stability and activity trade-offs. J Mol Biol. 2002; 320(1):85-95. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00400-X. View

Chen W, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Gan J, Ji Q . Molecular basis for the PAM expansion and fidelity enhancement of an evolved Cas9 nuclease. PLoS Biol. 2019; 17(10):e3000496. PMC: 6808508. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000496. View

10.

Heller G, Aprile F, Michaels T, Limbocker R, Perni M, Ruggeri F . Small-molecule sequestration of amyloid-β as a drug discovery strategy for Alzheimer's disease. Sci Adv. 2020; 6(45). PMC: 7673680. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abb5924. View

11.

Shirts M, Chodera J . Statistically optimal analysis of samples from multiple equilibrium states. J Chem Phys. 2008; 129(12):124105. PMC: 2671659. DOI: 10.1063/1.2978177. View

12.

Bussi G, Donadio D, Parrinello M . Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J Chem Phys. 2007; 126(1):014101. DOI: 10.1063/1.2408420. View

13.

Banas P, Hollas D, Zgarbova M, Jurecka P, Orozco M, Cheatham 3rd T . Performance of Molecular Mechanics Force Fields for RNA Simulations: Stability of UUCG and GNRA Hairpins. J Chem Theory Comput. 2022; 6(12):3836-3849. PMC: 8916691. DOI: 10.1021/ct100481h. View

14.

East K, Newton J, Morzan U, Narkhede Y, Acharya A, Skeens E . Allosteric Motions of the CRISPR-Cas9 HNH Nuclease Probed by NMR and Molecular Dynamics. J Am Chem Soc. 2019; 142(3):1348-1358. PMC: 7497131. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b10521. View

15.

Nierzwicki L, Arantes P, Saha A, Palermo G . Establishing the allosteric mechanism in CRISPR-Cas9. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci. 2021; 11(3). PMC: 8315640. DOI: 10.1002/wcms.1503. View

16.

Zuo Z, Liu J . Allosteric regulation of CRISPR-Cas9 for DNA-targeting and cleavage. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2020; 62:166-174. PMC: 7308215. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2020.01.013. View

17.

Nierzwicki L, East K, Morzan U, Arantes P, Batista V, Lisi G . Enhanced specificity mutations perturb allosteric signaling in CRISPR-Cas9. Elife. 2021; 10. PMC: 8741213. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.73601. View

18.

Romero P, Arnold F . Exploring protein fitness landscapes by directed evolution. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009; 10(12):866-76. PMC: 2997618. DOI: 10.1038/nrm2805. View

19.

Tian C, Kasavajhala K, Belfon K, Raguette L, Huang H, Migues A . ff19SB: Amino-Acid-Specific Protein Backbone Parameters Trained against Quantum Mechanics Energy Surfaces in Solution. J Chem Theory Comput. 2019; 16(1):528-552. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00591. View

20.

Galindo-Murillo R, Robertson J, Zgarbova M, Sponer J, Otyepka M, Jurecka P . Assessing the Current State of Amber Force Field Modifications for DNA. J Chem Theory Comput. 2016; 12(8):4114-27. PMC: 4980684. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00186. View