» Articles » PMID: 39801327

Predictive Accuracy of the Violence Risk Assessment Checklist for Youth in Acute Institutions: A Prospective Naturalistic Multicenter Study

Overview
Journal Eur Psychiatry
Date 2025 Jan 13
PMID 39801327
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Acute health and social services for children and adolescents often struggle with youth aggression and violence. Early identification of violence risk during institutional stay can help prevent violent incidents. As such, this study assessed the predictive accuracy of the Violence Risk Assessment Checklist for Youth (V-RISK-Y) aged 12-18 in two different juvenile settings providing 24-hour services for youth. Institutions were included from child and adolescent inpatient psychiatry and residential youth care under child protective services.

Methods: A prospective, naturalistic observational study design was employed. V-RISK-Y was administered for youth admitted to four acute inpatient psychiatric units and four acute residential youth care institutions. Incidents of violence and threats during the youth's stay were registered by institutional staff. In total, 517 youth were included in analyses, 59 of whom were registered with at least one incident of violence or threats during their stay. Area under curve (AUC) and logistic regression analyses were used to assess predictive accuracy and validity of V-RISK-Y.

Results: For the overall sample, V-RISK-Y had good predictive accuracy, and the sum score of V-RISK-Y significantly predicted registered violent incidents. Stratified analyses indicated good predictive accuracy of V-RISK-Y for the inpatient units, but not for the residential youth care institutions.

Conclusions: Findings imply that V-RISK-Y is accurate in identifying violence risk for youth admitted to inpatient psychiatric units but has limited predictive accuracy in residential youth care institutions. Future research should explore approaches to correctly identify violence risk in residential care settings.

References
1.
Singh J, Yang S, Mulvey E . Reporting guidance for violence risk assessment predictive validity studies: the RAGEE Statement. Law Hum Behav. 2014; 39(1):15-22. DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000090. View

2.
Jozefiak T, Kayed N, Rimehaug T, Wormdal A, Brubakk A, Wichstrom L . Prevalence and comorbidity of mental disorders among adolescents living in residential youth care. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015; 25(1):33-47. PMC: 4698296. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-015-0700-x. View

3.
Boxer P, Sloan-Power E . Coping with violence: a comprehensive framework and implications for understanding resilience. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2013; 14(3):209-21. PMC: 7238431. DOI: 10.1177/1524838013487806. View

4.
Iozzino L, Ferrari C, Large M, Nielssen O, de Girolamo G . Prevalence and Risk Factors of Violence by Psychiatric Acute Inpatients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0128536. PMC: 4464653. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128536. View

5.
Abderhalden C, Needham I, Dassen T, Halfens R, Haug H, Fischer J . Structured risk assessment and violence in acute psychiatric wards: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2008; 193(1):44-50. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.045534. View