Fat Vs. Sugar: The Case for a Saturated Fat Tax in Italy

Overview

Journal Health Econ

Publisher Wiley

Date 2025 Jan 12

PMID 39799472

Authors

Valeria di Cosmo

Silvia Tiezzi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

When judging the distributional impact of unhealthy food taxes, what matters is not just how much low income people would pay but how much the such taxes would benefit or harm them overall. In this paper, we assess the consumer welfare impact of a fat tax net of its expected benefits computed as savings from weight loss. Using Italian data, we estimate a censored Exact Affine Stone Index (EASI) incomplete demand system for food groups, simulating changes in purchases, calorie intake, consumer welfare, and the monetary value of short-run health benefits. While the Italian government has proposed a sugar tax, we show that there is no significant excess consumption of added sugars among Italian adults. Instead, excessive fat consumption is more prevalent, making a fat tax a more compelling and effective solution to address diet-related health risks. Our results suggest costs from fat taxation are larger than benefits at all income levels. As a fraction of income, the net impact would be slightly regressively distributed.

References

Zhen C, Finkelstein E, Nonnemaker J, Karns S, Todd J . Predicting the Effects of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes on Food and Beverage Demand in a Large Demand System. Am J Agric Econ. 2014; 96(1):1-25. PMC: 4022288. DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aat049. View

Lin B, Smith T, Lee J, Hall K . Measuring weight outcomes for obesity intervention strategies: the case of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Econ Hum Biol. 2011; 9(4):329-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2011.08.007. View

Burkhauser R, Cawley J . Beyond BMI: the value of more accurate measures of fatness and obesity in social science research. J Health Econ. 2008; 27(2):519-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.05.005. View

Wilde P, Huang Y, Sy S, Abrahams-Gessel S, Jardim T, Paarlberg R . Cost-Effectiveness of a US National Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax With a Multistakeholder Approach: Who Pays and Who Benefits. Am J Public Health. 2018; 109(2):276-284. PMC: 6336039. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304803. View

Hall K, Sacks G, Chandramohan D, Chow C, Wang Y, Gortmaker S . Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight. Lancet. 2011; 378(9793):826-37. PMC: 3880593. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60812-X. View

Caro J, Valizadeh P, Correa A, Silva A, Ng S . Combined fiscal policies to promote healthier diets: Effects on purchases and consumer welfare. PLoS One. 2020; 15(1):e0226731. PMC: 6961856. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226731. View

Cawley J, Frisvold D, Hill A, Jones D . The impact of the Philadelphia beverage tax on purchases and consumption by adults and children. J Health Econ. 2019; 67:102225. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102225. View

Cawley J, Meyerhoefer C . The medical care costs of obesity: an instrumental variables approach. J Health Econ. 2011; 31(1):219-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.10.003. View

Lal A, Mantilla-Herrera A, Veerman L, Backholer K, Sacks G, Moodie M . Modelled health benefits of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax across different socioeconomic groups in Australia: A cost-effectiveness and equity analysis. PLoS Med. 2017; 14(6):e1002326. PMC: 5486958. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002326. View

10.

Spinelli A, Censi L, Mandolini D, Ciardullo S, Salvatore M, Mazzarella G . Inequalities in Childhood Nutrition, Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Obesity in Italy. Nutrients. 2023; 15(18). PMC: 10534384. DOI: 10.3390/nu15183893. View

11.

Kao K, Jones A, Ohinmaa A, Paulden M . The health and financial impacts of a sugary drink tax across different income groups in Canada. Econ Hum Biol. 2020; 38:100869. DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100869. View

12.

Fichera E, Mora T, Lopez-Valcarcel B, Roche D . How do consumers respond to "sin taxes"? New evidence from a tax on sugary drinks. Soc Sci Med. 2021; 274:113799. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113799. View

13.

Wright A, Smith K, Hellowell M . Policy lessons from health taxes: a systematic review of empirical studies. BMC Public Health. 2017; 17(1):583. PMC: 5477308. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4497-z. View

14.

Harding M, Lovenheim M . The effect of prices on nutrition: Comparing the impact of product- and nutrient-specific taxes. J Health Econ. 2017; 53:53-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.02.003. View

15.

Crudu F, Neri L, Tiezzi S . Family ties and child obesity in Italy. Econ Hum Biol. 2020; 40:100951. DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100951. View

16.

Finkelstein E, Zhen C, Nonnemaker J, Todd J . Impact of targeted beverage taxes on higher- and lower-income households. Arch Intern Med. 2010; 170(22):2028-34. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.449. View