» Articles » PMID: 39797916

Evaluating Alignment of UK Commercial Baby Food Products with the WHO Nutrient and Promotion Profile Model

Overview
Journal Eur J Pediatr
Date 2025 Jan 11
PMID 39797916
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The first 1000 days of life are critical for long-term health outcomes, and there is increasing concern about the suitability of commercial food products for infants, toddlers, and children. This study evaluates the compliance of UK commercial baby food products with WHO Nutrient and Promotion Profile Model (NPPM) guidelines.

Methods: Between February and April 2023, data on 469 baby food products marketed for infants and children under 36 months were collected from the online platforms of four major UK supermarkets. Nutritional composition and labelling information were assessed using the NPPM criteria. Quantitative analyses were performed using IBM SPSS, presenting data as means with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: While 75% of products met the minimum energy content criteria, compliance with total sugar content and protein requirements was 59% and 94%, respectively. Overall, only 45% of products adhered to NPPM nutritional standards. Promotional assessments revealed that no products met the requirements for appropriate nutrient, health, or marketing claims. Furthermore, only 5% of products included adequate statements in support of breastfeeding.

Conclusion: This study highlights the need for stricter nutritional and promotional standards in the UK baby food industry to foster healthier early dietary habits. Regulatory measures are essential to align commercial baby food products with WHO recommendations, reducing inappropriate claims and improving nutritional quality.

References
1.
Martin-Rodriguez A, Bustamante-Sanchez A, Martinez-Guardado I, Navarro-Jimenez E, Plata-SanJuan E, Tornero-Aguilera J . Infancy Dietary Patterns, Development, and Health: An Extensive Narrative Review. Children (Basel). 2022; 9(7). PMC: 9319947. DOI: 10.3390/children9071072. View

2.
Di Cesare M, Soric M, Bovet P, Miranda J, Bhutta Z, Stevens G . The epidemiological burden of obesity in childhood: a worldwide epidemic requiring urgent action. BMC Med. 2019; 17(1):212. PMC: 6876113. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-019-1449-8. View

3.
Boatwright M, Lawrence M, Russell C, Russ K, McCoy D, Baker P . The Politics of Regulating Foods for Infants and Young Children: A Case Study on the Framing and Contestation of Codex Standard-Setting Processes on Breast-Milk Substitutes. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022; 11(11):2422-2439. PMC: 9818087. DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.161. View

4.
Langley-Evans S . Complementary feeding: Should baby be leading the way?. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2022; 35(2):247-249. PMC: 9303566. DOI: 10.1111/jhn.12988. View

5.
Maalouf J, Cogswell M, Bates M, Yuan K, Scanlon K, Pehrsson P . Sodium, sugar, and fat content of complementary infant and toddler foods sold in the United States, 2015. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017; 105(6):1443-1452. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.116.142653. View