» Articles » PMID: 39797264

A Comprehensive Analysis of Genioplasty in Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review and Institutional Cohort Study

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Date 2025 Jan 11
PMID 39797264
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Facial feminization surgery (FFS) is critical to gender-affirming surgery, consisting of craniomaxillofacial procedures to align facial features with a patient's gender identity. Central to FFS is genioplasty, which reshapes or repositions the chin; however, limited research exists on genioplasty in FFS. This review and cohort analysis aim to evaluate current practices and outcomes for individuals undergoing FFS with genioplasty. A systematic review included transfeminine individuals undergoing FFS with genioplasty. A retrospective study reviewed FFS cases with genioplasty between 2017 and 2024. Data collected included demographics, imaging, virtual surgical planning (VSP), complications, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The review included 12 studies with 1417 patients, with 34.2% undergoing genioplasty. The mean age was 37.3 years, and 60.1% were White. Preoperative imaging and VSP were used in 66.7% of studies, 3D-printed cutting guides in 37.5%, and 3D reconstruction in 75.0%. Reduction genioplasty was the most common technique. All PROs indicated high satisfaction, with a 2.67% revision rate. Complications were low (0.55%), with infections being most frequent (0.48%). In the institutional cohort, 351 patients underwent FFS, with 64.4% undergoing genioplasty, significantly higher than in the review ( < 0.001). Sliding genioplasty was preferred without preoperative imaging or VSP. Postoperative dissatisfaction was 3.54%, with 0.88% requiring revision ( = 0.063). Complication rates (1.77%) were similar to those of the review ( = 0.065). Genioplasty is important in FFS, with low complication and revision rates and high patient satisfaction. However, gaps remain in validated PROs and technique-specific outcomes. While preoperative imaging and VSP show benefits, comparable outcomes are achievable without them.

References
1.
Lekakis G, Claes P, Hamilton 3rd G, Hellings P . Evolution of Preoperative Rhinoplasty Consult by Computer Imaging. Facial Plast Surg. 2016; 32(1):80-7. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1570125. View

2.
La Padula S, Hersant B, Chatel H, Aguilar P, Bosc R, Roccaro G . One-step facial feminization surgery: The importance of a custom-made preoperative planning and patient satisfaction assessment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019; 72(10):1694-1699. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.06.014. View

3.
Wang M, Rodman R . Gender Facial Affirmation Surgery; Techniques for Feminizing the Chin. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2023; 31(3):419-431. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsc.2023.04.006. View

4.
Jones B, Vesely M . Osseous genioplasty in facial aesthetic surgery--a personal perspective reviewing 54 patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006; 59(11):1177-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2006.04.011. View

5.
Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View