Effects of Intensive Impairment-Oriented Arm Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke Survivors: An Observational Cohort Study

Overview

Journal J Clin Med

Date 2025 Jan 11

PMID 39797259

Authors

Thomas Platz

Katharina Kaiser

Tina Laborn

Michael Laborn

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

: To assess the effects of a two-week course of intensive impairment-oriented arm rehabilitation for chronic stroke survivors on motor function. : An observational cohort study that enrolled chronic stroke survivors (≥6 months after stroke) with mild to severe arm paresis, who received a two-week course of impairment-oriented and technology-supported arm rehabilitation (1:1 participant-therapist setting), which was carried out daily (five days a week) for four hours. The outcome measures were as follows: the primary outcome was the arm motor function of the affected arm (mild paresis: BBT, NHPT; severe paresis: Fugl-Meyer arm motor score). The secondary outcomes were measures of finger strength, active ROM, spasticity, joint mobility/pain, somatosensation, emotional distress, quality of life, acceptability, and adverse events. : One hundred chronic stroke survivors (≥6 months after stroke) with mild to severe arm paresis were recruited. The training was acceptable (drop-out rate 3%; 3/100). The clinical assessment indicated improved motor function (SMD 0.42, 95% CI 0.36-0.49; n = 97), reduced spasticity/resistance to passive movement, and slightly improved joint mobility/pain and somatosensation. The technology-based objective measures corroborated the improved active range of motion for arm and finger joints, reduced finger spasticity/resistance to passive movement, and the increased amount of use in daily life, but there was no effect on finger strength. The patient's emotional well-being and quality of life were positively influenced. Adverse events were reported by the majority of participants (51%, 49/97) and were mild. : Structured intensive impairment-oriented and technology-supported arm rehabilitation can promote motor function among chronic stroke survivors with mild to severe arm paresis and is an acceptable and tolerable form of treatment when supervised and adjusted by therapists.

References

van der Vliet R, Selles R, Andrinopoulou E, Nijland R, Ribbers G, Frens M . Predicting Upper Limb Motor Impairment Recovery after Stroke: A Mixture Model. Ann Neurol. 2020; 87(3):383-393. PMC: 7065018. DOI: 10.1002/ana.25679. View

Chen P, Lin K, Liing R, Wu C, Chen C, Chang K . Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation. Qual Life Res. 2015; 25(6):1585-96. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1196-z. View

Demeurisse G, DEMOL O, Robaye E . Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol. 1980; 19(6):382-9. DOI: 10.1159/000115178. View

Ward N, Brander F, Kelly K . Intensive upper limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke: outcomes from the Queen Square programme. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019; 90(5):498-506. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319954. View

Nascimento L, Gaviorno L, de Souza Brunelli M, Goncalves J, Areas F . Home-based is as effective as centre-based rehabilitation for improving upper limb motor recovery and activity limitations after stroke: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2022; 36(12):1565-1577. DOI: 10.1177/02692155221121015. View

Pike S, Lannin N, Wales K, Cusick A . A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Action Research Arm Test in neurorehabilitation. Aust Occup Ther J. 2018; 65(5):449-471. DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12527. View

Stinear C, Lang C, Zeiler S, Byblow W . Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2020; 19(4):348-360. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30415-6. View

Jorgensen H, Nakayama H, Raaschou H, Olsen T . Stroke. Neurologic and functional recovery the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 1999; 10(4):887-906. View

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A . G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39(2):175-91. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193146. View

10.

Platz T, Vuadens P, Eickhof C, Arnold P, van Kaick S, Heise K . REPAS, a summary rating scale for resistance to passive movement: item selection, reliability and validity. Disabil Rehabil. 2007; 30(1):44-53. DOI: 10.1080/09638280701191743. View

11.

McCabe J, Monkiewicz M, Holcomb J, Pundik S, Daly J . Comparison of robotics, functional electrical stimulation, and motor learning methods for treatment of persistent upper extremity dysfunction after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 96(6):981-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.022. View

12.

Broeks J, Lankhorst G, Rumping K, Prevo A . The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil. 1999; 21(8):357-64. DOI: 10.1080/096382899297459. View

13.

MAHONEY F, BARTHEL D . FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965; 14:61-5. View

14.

Platz T . Impairment-oriented training (IOT)--scientific concept and evidence-based treatment strategies. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004; 22(3-5):301-15. View

15.

Pollock A, Farmer S, Brady M, Langhorne P, Mead G, Mehrholz J . Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (11):CD010820. PMC: 6469541. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010820.pub2. View

16.

Kwakkel G, Kollen B, van der Grond J, Prevo A . Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003; 34(9):2181-6. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000087172.16305.CD. View

17.

Mehrholz J, Pollock A, Pohl M, Kugler J, Elsner B . Systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of robotic-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living and upper limb function after stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020; 17(1):83. PMC: 7325016. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-020-00715-0. View

18.

Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Platz T, Kugler J, Elsner B . Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 9:CD006876. PMC: 6513114. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006876.pub5. View

19.

Dyer M, Goldsmith K, Sharples L, Buxton M . A review of health utilities using the EQ-5D in studies of cardiovascular disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010; 8:13. PMC: 2824714. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-13. View

20.

Villepinte C, Verma A, Dimeglio C, De Boissezon X, Gasq D . Responsiveness of kinematic and clinical measures of upper-limb motor function after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2020; 64(2):101366. DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2020.02.005. View