» Articles » PMID: 39788691

Utilization of Acid Suppressants After Withdrawal of Ranitidine in Korea: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis

Overview
Date 2025 Jan 9
PMID 39788691
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This study was performed to evaluate the utilization patterns of acid suppressants following the withdrawal of ranitidine in Korea.

Methods: Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA) data from January 2016 to May 2023 were utilized to assess the usage of histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for acid-related diseases. Drug utilization was calculated for each agent based on the defined daily dose (DDD). To evaluate changes in utilization following the ranitidine recall, an interrupted time series analysis was conducted using segmented linear regression and an autoregressive integrated moving average model.

Results: Before the withdrawal of ranitidine, the DDD per 100 000 inhabitants per day was increasing by 6.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7 to 9.0) for H2RAs and by 19.3 (95% CI, 16.9 to 21.8) for PPIs each month. After the recall, H2RA utilization immediately declined by -1041.7 (95% CI, -1115.8 to -967.7), followed by a monthly increase of 6.6 (95% CI, 3.7 to 9.6) above the previous trend. PPI utilization temporarily surged by 235.2 (95% CI, 149.1 to 321.3), then displayed a monthly increase of 4.1 (95% CI, 0.7 to 7.6) on top of the pre-recall trend. Among PPIs, esomeprazole and rabeprazole demonstrated notable increases, representing the most commonly used acid suppressants in 2023.

Conclusions: PPI usage rose prominently following the withdrawal of ranitidine from the market. Considering the potential adverse effects of PPIs, further research is necessary to evaluate the public health implications of shifts in the utilization of acid suppressants.

Citing Articles

Effect of PM and its constituents on hospital admissions for cardiometabolic multimorbidity in Urumqi, China.

Wu D, Li C, Shi Y, Han J, Lu Y, Yilihamu Y Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6394.

PMID: 39984684 PMC: 11845472. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-90789-4.

References
1.
Olbe L, Carlsson E, Lindberg P . A proton-pump inhibitor expedition: the case histories of omeprazole and esomeprazole. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003; 2(2):132-9. DOI: 10.1038/nrd1010. View

2.
Iwakiri K, Fujiwara Y, Manabe N, Ihara E, Kuribayashi S, Akiyama J . Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2021. J Gastroenterol. 2022; 57(4):267-285. PMC: 8938399. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-022-01861-z. View

3.
Meng R, Chen L, Zhang M, Cai W, Yin S, Fan Y . Effectiveness and Safety of Histamine H2 Receptor Antagonists: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses. J Clin Pharmacol. 2022; 63(1):7-20. DOI: 10.1002/jcph.2147. View

4.
Khalili H, Huang E, Jacobson B, Camargo Jr C, Feskanich D, Chan A . Use of proton pump inhibitors and risk of hip fracture in relation to dietary and lifestyle factors: a prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2012; 344:e372. PMC: 3269660. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e372. View

5.
Chen K, Lou H, Lin H, Lee S . Seasonal variation in the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Med Sci. 2009; 338(6):453-8. DOI: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181b51fbd. View