Social Network Analysis As a New Tool to Measure Academic Impact of Physicians

Overview

Journal Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol

Publisher Wiley

Date 2025 Jan 9

PMID 39780864

Authors

Niketna Vivek

Evan Clark

Lily Gao

Shenmeng Xu

Steven Baskauf

Kirsten Nguyen

Melissa Goldin

Kavita Prasad

Alexis Miller

Panpan Zhang

Shiayin Yang

Sarah Rohde

Michael Topf

Alexander Gelbard

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: H-index is a widely used metric quantifying a researcher's productivity and impact based on an author's publications and citations. Though convenient to calculate, h-index fails to incorporate collaborations and interrelationships between physicians into its assessment of academic impact, leading to limited insight into grouped networks. We present social network analysis as a tool to measure relationships between physicians and quantify their academic impact.

Methods: A bibliometric multicenter analysis was conducted on physician faculty from 129 US ACGME accredited otolaryngology programs who have publications with a physician co-author in the field. Using web searches, 2494 physician faculty were identified. Scopus IDs, h-indices, and publication data for these physicians were identified using multiple Elsevier APIs queried in December 2023. Publications with multiple otolaryngology physician co-authors were included. Network and sub network maps were generated using Gephi and analyzed with custom R scripts. Centrality measures (degree, PageRank, betweenness centralities) quantified collaboration propensity. Non-parametric correlation analysis between centrality measures and h-index was conducted. Sankey diagrams were plotted using ggplot2.

Results: A co-authorship network of 2259 physicians was constructed. Physicians were visualized as nodes with collaborations as links. Centrality measures correlated strongly with h-index (h-index vs. degree centrality: = 0.62, h-index vs. PageRank: = 0.55, h-index vs. betweenness centrality: = 0.55; < .0001). Analysis revealed novel insights into physician network structure, identifying 14 communities primarily populated by single subspecialties with varied node density.

Conclusion: Social network analysis showed moderate correlation between social connectedness measures and h-index, supporting its use in measuring academic impact. In otolaryngology, collaborative interactions within the academic community are strongly shaped by sub-specialty affiliation and academic institution.

References

Hirsch J . An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(46):16569-72. PMC: 1283832. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102. View

Hobson E, Silk M, Fefferman N, Larremore D, Rombach P, Shai S . A guide to choosing and implementing reference models for social network analysis. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021; 96(6):2716-2734. PMC: 9292850. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12775. View

Eloy J, Svider P, Mauro K, Setzen M, Baredes S . Impact of fellowship training on research productivity in academic otolaryngology. Laryngoscope. 2012; 122(12):2690-4. DOI: 10.1002/lary.23749. View

Svider P, Choudhry Z, Choudhry O, Baredes S, Liu J, Eloy J . The use of the h-index in academic otolaryngology. Laryngoscope. 2012; 123(1):103-6. DOI: 10.1002/lary.23569. View

Warner E, Carapinha R, Weber G, Hill E, Reede J . Faculty Promotion and Attrition: The Importance of Coauthor Network Reach at an Academic Medical Center. J Gen Intern Med. 2015; 31(1):60-7. PMC: 4700018. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-015-3463-7. View

Moffatt D, Shah P, Wright A, Zon K, Pine H . An Otolaryngologist's Guide to Understanding the H-index and How It Could Affect Your Future Career. OTO Open. 2022; 6(2):2473974X221099499. PMC: 9087246. DOI: 10.1177/2473974X221099499. View

Eloy J, Blake D, DAguillo C, Svider P, Folbe A, Baredes S . Academic Benchmarks for Otolaryngology Leaders. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015; 124(8):622-9. DOI: 10.1177/0003489415573073. View

Wang R, Lewis M, Zheng-Pywell R, Julson J, Smithson M, Chen H . Using the H-index as a factor in the promotion of surgical faculty. Heliyon. 2022; 8(4):e09319. PMC: 9061622. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09319. View

Zhang C . The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations. PLoS One. 2009; 4(5):e5429. PMC: 2673580. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005429. View

10.

Shires C, Klug T, Meacham R, Sebelik M . Factors predictive of an academic otolaryngologist's scholarly impact. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021; 7(4):275-279. PMC: 8486697. DOI: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.11.003. View

11.

Svider P, Blake D, Setzen M, Folbe A, Baredes S, Eloy J . Rhinology fellowship training and its scholarly impact. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013; 27(5):e131-4. View

12.

Newman M . Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(23):8577-82. PMC: 1482622. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0601602103. View