» Articles » PMID: 39779853

Satellite DNA Shapes Dictate Pericentromere Packaging in Female Meiosis

Overview
Journal Nature
Date 2025 Jan 8
PMID 39779853
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The abundance and sequence of satellite DNA at and around centromeres is evolving rapidly despite the highly conserved and essential process through which the centromere directs chromosome inheritance. The impact of such rapid evolution is unclear. Here we find that sequence-dependent DNA shape dictates packaging of pericentromeric satellites in female meiosis through a conserved DNA-shape-recognizing chromatin architectural protein, high mobility group AT-hook 1 (HMGA1). Pericentromeric heterochromatin in two closely related mouse species, M. musculus and M. spretus, forms on divergent satellites that differ by both density of narrow DNA minor grooves and HMGA1 recruitment. HMGA1 binds preferentially to M. musculus satellites, and depletion in M. musculus oocytes causes massive stretching of pericentromeric satellites, disruption of kinetochore organization and delays in bipolar spindle assembly. In M. musculus × spretus hybrid oocytes, HMGA1 depletion disproportionately impairs M. musculus pericentromeres and microtubule attachment to their kinetochores. Thus, DNA shape affects both pericentromere packaging and the segregation machinery. We propose that rapid evolution of centromere and pericentromere DNA does not disrupt these essential processes when the satellites adopt DNA shapes recognized by conserved architectural proteins (such as HMGA1). By packaging these satellites, architectural proteins become part of the centromeric and pericentromeric chromatin, suggesting an evolutionary strategy that lowers the cost of megabase-scale satellite expansion.

Citing Articles

Adaptive evolution of CENP-T modulates centromere binding.

Dudka D, Nguyen A, Boese K, Marescal O, Akins R, Black B Curr Biol. 2025; 35(5):1012-1022.e5.

PMID: 39947176 PMC: 11903153. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2025.01.017.

References
1.
Henikoff S, Ahmad K, Malik H . The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA. Science. 2001; 293(5532):1098-102. DOI: 10.1126/science.1062939. View

2.
Altemose N, Logsdon G, Bzikadze A, Sidhwani P, Langley S, Caldas G . Complete genomic and epigenetic maps of human centromeres. Science. 2022; 376(6588):eabl4178. PMC: 9233505. DOI: 10.1126/science.abl4178. View

3.
Logsdon G, Rozanski A, Ryabov F, Potapova T, Shepelev V, Catacchio C . The variation and evolution of complete human centromeres. Nature. 2024; 629(8010):136-145. PMC: 11062924. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07278-3. View

4.
Strauss F, Varshavsky A . A protein binds to a satellite DNA repeat at three specific sites that would be brought into mutual proximity by DNA folding in the nucleosome. Cell. 1984; 37(3):889-901. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90424-0. View

5.
Vogel B, Loschberger A, Sauer M, Hock R . Cross-linking of DNA through HMGA1 suggests a DNA scaffold. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 39(16):7124-33. PMC: 3167630. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr396. View