Effects of Mental Workload Manipulation on Electroencephalography Spectrum Oscillation and Microstates in Multitasking Environments

Overview

Journal Brain Behav

Date 2025 Jan 8

PMID 39778947

Authors

Wenbin Li

Shan Cheng

Jing Dai

Yaoming Chang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Multitasking during flights leads to a high mental workload, which is detrimental for maintaining task performance. Electroencephalography (EEG) power spectral analysis based on frequency-band oscillations and microstate analysis based on global brain network activation can be used to evaluate mental workload. This study explored the effects of a high mental workload during simulated flight multitasking on EEG frequency-band power and microstate parameters.

Methods: Thirty-six participants performed multitasking with low and high mental workloads after 4 consecutive days of training. Two levels of mental workload were set by varying the number of subtasks. EEG signals were acquired during the task. Power spectral and microstate analyses were performed on the EEG. The indices of four frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, and beta) and four microstate classes (A-D) were calculated, changes in the frequency-band power and microstate parameters under different mental workloads were compared, and the relationships between the two types of EEG indices were analyzed.

Results: The theta-, alpha-, and beta-band powers were higher under the high than under the low mental workload condition. Compared with the low mental workload condition, the high mental workload condition had a lower global explained variance and time parameters of microstate B but higher time parameters of microstate D. Less frequent transitions between microstates A and B and more frequent transitions between microstates C and D were observed during high mental workload conditions. The time parameters of microstate B were positively correlated with the delta-, theta-, and beta-band powers, whereas the duration of microstate C was negatively correlated with the beta-band power.

Conclusion: EEG frequency-band power and microstate parameters can be used to detect a high mental workload. Power spectral analyses based on frequency-band oscillations and microstate analyses based on global brain network activation were not completely isolated during multitasking.

References

Li W, Li R, Xie X, Chang Y . Evaluating mental workload during multitasking in simulated flight. Brain Behav. 2022; 12(4):e2489. PMC: 9014989. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2489. View

Ke Y, Jiang T, Liu S, Cao Y, Jiao X, Jiang J . Cross-Task Consistency of Electroencephalography-Based Mental Workload Indicators: Comparisons Between Power Spectral Density and Task-Irrelevant Auditory Event-Related Potentials. Front Neurosci. 2021; 15:703139. PMC: 8637174. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.703139. View

Deolindo C, Ribeiro M, de Aratanha M, Scarpari J, Forster C, da Silva R . Microstates in complex and dynamical environments: Unraveling situational awareness in critical helicopter landing maneuvers. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021; 42(10):3168-3181. PMC: 8193508. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25426. View

Charles R, Nixon J . Measuring mental workload using physiological measures: A systematic review. Appl Ergon. 2018; 74:221-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.028. View

Kakkos I, Dimitrakopoulos G, Gao L, Zhang Y, Qi P, Matsopoulos G . Mental Workload Drives Different Reorganizations of Functional Cortical Connectivity Between 2D and 3D Simulated Flight Experiments. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019; 27(9):1704-1713. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2930082. View

Tamano R, Ogawa T, Katagiri A, Cai C, Asai T, Kawanabe M . Event-related microstate dynamics represents working memory performance. Neuroimage. 2022; 263:119669. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119669. View

Seitzman B, Abell M, Bartley S, Erickson M, Bolbecker A, Hetrick W . Cognitive manipulation of brain electric microstates. Neuroimage. 2016; 146:533-543. PMC: 5321823. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.002. View

James C, Hesse C . Independent component analysis for biomedical signals. Physiol Meas. 2005; 26(1):R15-39. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/26/1/r02. View

Catrambone V, Valenza G . Microstates of the cortical brain-heart axis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2023; 44(17):5846-5857. PMC: 10619395. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26480. View

10.

Gola M, Magnuski M, Szumska I, Wrobel A . EEG beta band activity is related to attention and attentional deficits in the visual performance of elderly subjects. Int J Psychophysiol. 2013; 89(3):334-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.05.007. View

11.

Korn U, Krylova M, Heck K, Haussinger F, Stark R, Alizadeh S . EEG-Microstates Reflect Auditory Distraction After Attentive Audiovisual Perception Recruitment of Cognitive Control Networks. Front Syst Neurosci. 2021; 15:751226. PMC: 8696261. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.751226. View

12.

Chen J, Ke Y, Ni G, Liu S, Ming D . Evidence for modulation of EEG microstates by mental workload levels and task types. Hum Brain Mapp. 2023; 45(1):e26552. PMC: 10789204. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26552. View

13.

Tarailis P, Koenig T, Michel C, Griskova-Bulanova I . The Functional Aspects of Resting EEG Microstates: A Systematic Review. Brain Topogr. 2023; 37(2):181-217. DOI: 10.1007/s10548-023-00958-9. View

14.

Kim K, Duc N, Choi M, Lee B . EEG microstate features according to performance on a mental arithmetic task. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):343. PMC: 7801706. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79423-7. View

15.

Kahya M, Liao K, Gustafson K, Akinwuntan A, Manor B, Devos H . Cortical Correlates of Increased Postural Task Difficulty in Young Adults: A Combined Pupillometry and EEG Study. Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(15). PMC: 9330778. DOI: 10.3390/s22155594. View

16.

Guan K, Zhang Z, Chai X, Tian Z, Liu T, Niu H . EEG Based Dynamic Functional Connectivity Analysis in Mental Workload Tasks With Different Types of Information. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2022; 30:632-642. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3156546. View

17.

Kaminski J, Brzezicka A, Gola M, Wrobel A . β band oscillations engagement in human alertness process. Int J Psychophysiol. 2011; 85(1):125-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.11.006. View

18.

Mun S, Whang M, Park S, Park M . Effects of mental workload on involuntary attention: A somatosensory ERP study. Neuropsychologia. 2017; 106:7-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.08.021. View

19.

Gentili R, Jaquess K, Shuggi I, Shaw E, Oh H, Lo L . Combined assessment of attentional reserve and cognitive-motor effort under various levels of challenge with a dry EEG system. Psychophysiology. 2018; 55(6):e13059. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13059. View

20.

Rubinstein J, Meyer D, Evans J . Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001; 27(4):763-97. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.27.4.763. View