» Articles » PMID: 39778866

Investigating the Origins of the Mutational Signatures in Cancer

Overview
Date 2025 Jan 8
PMID 39778866
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Most of the risk factors associated with chronic and complex diseases, such as cancer, stem from exogenous and endogenous exposures experienced throughout an individual's life, collectively known as the exposome. These exposures can modify DNA, which can subsequently lead to the somatic mutations found in all normal and tumor tissues. Understanding the precise origins of specific somatic mutations has been challenging due to multitude of DNA adducts (i.e. the DNA adductome) and their diverse positions within the genome. Thus far, this limitation has prevented researchers from precisely linking exposures to DNA adducts and DNA adducts to subsequent mutational outcomes. Indeed, many common mutations observed in human cancers appear to originate from error-prone endogenous processes. Consequently, it remains unclear whether these mutations result from exposure-induced DNA adducts, or arise indirectly from endogenous processes or are a combination of both. In this review, we summarize approaches that aim to bridge our understanding of the mechanism by which exposure leads to DNA damage and then to mutation and highlight some of the remaining challenges and shortcomings to fully supporting this paradigm. We emphasize the need to integrate cellular DNA adductomics, long read-based mapping, single-molecule duplex sequencing of native DNA molecules and advanced computational analysis. This proposed holistic approach aims to unveil the causal connections between key DNA modifications and the mutational landscape, whether they originate from external exposures, internal processes or a combination of both, thereby addressing key questions in cancer biology.

References
1.
Steele C, Abbasi A, Islam S, Bowes A, Khandekar A, Haase K . Signatures of copy number alterations in human cancer. Nature. 2022; 606(7916):984-991. PMC: 9242861. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04738-6. View

2.
Lynch M, Ackerman M, Gout J, Long H, Sung W, Thomas W . Genetic drift, selection and the evolution of the mutation rate. Nat Rev Genet. 2016; 17(11):704-714. DOI: 10.1038/nrg.2016.104. View

3.
Forbes S, Bhamra G, Bamford S, Dawson E, Kok C, Clements J . The Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC). Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2008; Chapter 10:Unit 10.11. PMC: 2705836. DOI: 10.1002/0471142905.hg1011s57. View

4.
van den Heuvel G, Kroeze L, Ligtenberg M, Grunberg K, Jansen E, von Rhein D . Mutational signature analysis in non-small cell lung cancer patients with a high tumor mutational burden. Respir Res. 2021; 22(1):302. PMC: 8611965. DOI: 10.1186/s12931-021-01871-0. View

5.
Fijalkowska I, Schaaper R, Jonczyk P . DNA replication fidelity in Escherichia coli: a multi-DNA polymerase affair. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012; 36(6):1105-21. PMC: 3391330. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00338.x. View