» Articles » PMID: 39776023

Using Quantitative Bias Analysis to Adjust for Misclassification of COVID-19 Outcomes: An Applied Example of Inhaled Corticosteroids and COVID-19 Outcomes

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2025 Jan 8
PMID 39776023
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: During the pandemic, there was concern that underascertainment of COVID-19 outcomes may impact treatment effect estimation in pharmacoepidemiologic studies. We assessed the impact of outcome misclassification on the association between inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and COVID-19 hospitalisation and death in the United Kingdom during the first pandemic wave using probabilistic bias analysis (PBA).

Methods: Using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum, we defined a cohort with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on 1 March 2020. We compared the risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation and death among users of ICS/long-acting β-agonist (LABA) and users of LABA/LAMA using inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) logistic regression. We used PBA to assess the impact of non-differential outcome misclassification. We assigned beta distributions to sensitivity and specificity and sampled from these 100 000 times for summary-level and 10 000 times for record-level PBA. Using these values, we simulated outcomes and applied IPTW logistic regression to adjust for confounding and misclassification. Sensitivity analyses excluded ICS + LABA + LAMA (triple therapy) users.

Results: Among 161 411 patients with COPD, ICS users had increased odds of COVID-19 hospitalisations and death compared with LABA/LAMA users (OR for COVID-19 hospitalisation 1.59 (95% CI 1.31-1.92); OR for COVID-19 death 1.63 (95% CI 1.26-2.11)). After IPTW and exclusion of people using triple therapy, ORs moved towards the null. All implementations of QBA, both record- and summary-level PBA, modestly shifted the ORs away from the null and increased uncertainty.

Conclusions: We observed increased risks of COVID-19 hospitalisation and death among ICS users compared to LABA/LAMA users. Outcome misclassification was unlikely to change the conclusions of the study, but confounding by indication remains a concern.

References
1.
Yu L, Bafadhel M, Dorward J, Hayward G, Saville B, Gbinigie O . Inhaled budesonide for COVID-19 in people at high risk of complications in the community in the UK (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, open-label, adaptive platform trial. Lancet. 2021; 398(10303):843-855. PMC: 8354567. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01744-X. View

2.
Schultze A, Walker A, Mackenna B, Morton C, Bhaskaran K, Brown J . Risk of COVID-19-related death among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma prescribed inhaled corticosteroids: an observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform. Lancet Respir Med. 2020; 8(11):1106-1120. PMC: 7515601. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30415-X. View

3.
Husby A, Pottegard A, Hviid A . Association between inhaled corticosteroid use and COVID-19 outcomes. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021; 30(11):1486-1492. PMC: 8441753. DOI: 10.1002/pds.5345. View

4.
Frazer J, Frazer G . Analysis of primary care prescription trends in England during the COVID-19 pandemic compared against a predictive model. Fam Med Community Health. 2021; 9(3). PMC: 8338320. DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2021-001143. View

5.
Schneeweiss S, Rassen J, Brown J, Rothman K, Happe L, Arlett P . Graphical Depiction of Longitudinal Study Designs in Health Care Databases. Ann Intern Med. 2019; 170(6):398-406. DOI: 10.7326/M18-3079. View