Hypermethylation at 45S RDNA Promoter in Cancers

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2025 Jan 8

PMID 39775079

Authors

Trang Thi Quynh Tran

Trang Hien Do

Tung The Pham

Phuong Thi Thu Luu

Oanh Minh Pham

Uyen Quynh Nguyen

Linh Dieu Vuong

Quang Ngoc Nguyen

Tuan Van Mai

Son Van Ho

Than Thi Nguyen

Lan Thi Thuong Vo

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The ribosomal genes (rDNA genes) encode 47S rRNA which accounts for up to 80% of all cellular RNA. At any given time, no more than 50% of rDNA genes are actively transcribed, and the other half is silent by forming heterochromatin structures through DNA methylation. In cancer cells, upregulation of ribosome biogenesis has been recognized as a hallmark feature, thus, the reduced methylation of rDNA promoter has been thought to support conformational changes of chromatin accessibility and the subsequent increase in rDNA transcription. However, an increase in the heterochromatin state through rDNA hypermethylation can be a protective mechanism teetering on the brink of a threshold where cancer cells rarely successfully proliferate. Hence, clarifying hypo- or hypermethylation of rDNA will unravel its additional cellular functions, including organization of genome architecture and regulation of gene expression, in response to growth signaling, cellular stressors, and carcinogenesis. Using the bisulfite-based quantitative real-time methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) method after ensuring unbiased amplification and complete bisulfite conversion of the minuscule DNA amount of 1 ng, we established that the rDNA promoter was significantly hypermethylated in 107 breast, 65 lung, and 135 colon tumour tissue samples (46.81%, 51.02% and 96.60%, respectively) as compared with their corresponding adjacent normal samples (26.84%, 38.26% and 77.52%, respectively; p < 0.0001). An excessive DNA input of 1 μg resulted in double-stranded rDNA remaining unconverted even after bisulfite conversion, hence the dramatic drop in the single-stranded DNA that strictly required for bisulfite conversion, and leading to an underestimation of rDNA promoter methylation, in other words, a faulty hypomethylation status of the rDNA promoter. Our results are in line with the hypothesis that an increase in rDNA methylation is a natural pathway protecting rDNA repeats that are extremely sensitive to DNA damage in cancer cells.

References

Larsen D, Stucki M . Nucleolar responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 44(2):538-44. PMC: 4737151. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv1312. View

Kobayashi T . Strategies to maintain the stability of the ribosomal RNA gene repeats--collaboration of recombination, cohesion, and condensation. Genes Genet Syst. 2006; 81(3):155-61. DOI: 10.1266/ggs.81.155. View

Tchurikov N, Fedoseeva D, Klushevskaya E, Slovohotov I, Chechetkin V, Kravatsky Y . rDNA Clusters Make Contact with Genes that Are Involved in Differentiation and Cancer and Change Contacts after Heat Shock Treatment. Cells. 2019; 8(11). PMC: 6912461. DOI: 10.3390/cells8111393. View

Xie W, Ling T, Zhou Y, Feng W, Zhu Q, Stunnenberg H . The chromatin remodeling complex NuRD establishes the poised state of rRNA genes characterized by bivalent histone modifications and altered nucleosome positions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(21):8161-6. PMC: 3361413. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1201262109. View

Gagnon-Kugler T, Langlois F, Stefanovsky V, Lessard F, Moss T . Loss of human ribosomal gene CpG methylation enhances cryptic RNA polymerase II transcription and disrupts ribosomal RNA processing. Mol Cell. 2009; 35(4):414-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.07.008. View

Fraga M, Esteller M . DNA methylation: a profile of methods and applications. Biotechniques. 2002; 33(3):632, 634, 636-49. DOI: 10.2144/02333rv01. View

Robinson M, Stirzaker C, Statham A, Coolen M, Song J, Nair S . Evaluation of affinity-based genome-wide DNA methylation data: effects of CpG density, amplification bias, and copy number variation. Genome Res. 2010; 20(12):1719-29. PMC: 2989998. DOI: 10.1101/gr.110601.110. View

van Sluis M, McStay B . Nucleolar reorganization in response to rDNA damage. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2017; 46:81-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2017.03.004. View

Herman J, Graff J, Myohanen S, Nelkin B, Baylin S . Methylation-specific PCR: a novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93(18):9821-6. PMC: 38513. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9821. View

10.

Sanij E, Hannan R . The role of UBF in regulating the structure and dynamics of transcriptionally active rDNA chromatin. Epigenetics. 2009; 4(6):374-82. DOI: 10.4161/epi.4.6.9449. View

11.

van Sluis M, McStay B . A localized nucleolar DNA damage response facilitates recruitment of the homology-directed repair machinery independent of cell cycle stage. Genes Dev. 2015; 29(11):1151-63. PMC: 4470283. DOI: 10.1101/gad.260703.115. View

12.

Son J, Hannan K, Poortinga G, Hein N, Cameron D, Ganley A . rDNA Chromatin Activity Status as a Biomarker of Sensitivity to the RNA Polymerase I Transcription Inhibitor CX-5461. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020; 8:568. PMC: 7349920. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00568. View

13.

Warnecke P, Stirzaker C, Melki J, Millar D, Paul C, Clark S . Detection and measurement of PCR bias in quantitative methylation analysis of bisulphite-treated DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25(21):4422-6. PMC: 147052. DOI: 10.1093/nar/25.21.4422. View

14.

Blokhina Y, Buchwalter A . Modeling the consequences of age-linked rDNA hypermethylation with dCas9-directed DNA methylation in human cells. PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0310626. PMC: 11637357. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310626. View

15.

Diesch J, Bywater M, Sanij E, Cameron D, Schierding W, Brajanovski N . Changes in long-range rDNA-genomic interactions associate with altered RNA polymerase II gene programs during malignant transformation. Commun Biol. 2019; 2:39. PMC: 6349880. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-019-0284-y. View

16.

Hung S, Lesmana A, Peck A, Lee R, Tchoubrieva E, Hannan K . Cell cycle and growth stimuli regulate different steps of RNA polymerase I transcription. Gene. 2016; 612:36-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2016.12.015. View

17.

Weeks S, Metge B, Samant R . The nucleolus: a central response hub for the stressors that drive cancer progression. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019; 76(22):4511-4524. PMC: 6841648. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-019-03231-0. View

18.

Ha S, Zhou H, Gautam M, Song Y, Wang C . Reduced ribosomal RNA expression and unchanged ribosomal DNA promoter methylation in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019; 7(7):e00783. PMC: 6625366. DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.783. View

19.

Duforestel M, Briand J, Bougras-Cartron G, Heymann D, Frenel J, Vallette F . Cell-free circulating epimarks in cancer monitoring. Epigenomics. 2020; 12(2):145-155. DOI: 10.2217/epi-2019-0170. View

20.

Paredes S, Angulo-Ibanez M, Tasselli L, Carlson S, Zheng W, Li T . The epigenetic regulator SIRT7 guards against mammalian cellular senescence induced by ribosomal DNA instability. J Biol Chem. 2018; 293(28):11242-11250. PMC: 6052228. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.AC118.003325. View