» Articles » PMID: 39775064

Challenges in Multinational Rare Disease Clinical Studies During COVID-19: Regulatory Assessment of Cipaglucosidase Alfa Plus Miglustat in Adults with Late-onset Pompe Disease

Overview
Journal J Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2025 Jan 8
PMID 39775064
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

PROPEL (ATB200-03; NCT03729362) compared the efficacy and safety of cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat (cipa + mig), a two-component therapy for late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD), versus alglucosidase alfa plus placebo (alg + pbo). The primary endpoint was change in 6-min walk distance (6MWD) from baseline to week 52. During PROPEL, COVID-19 interrupted some planned study visits and assessment windows, leading to delayed visits, make-up assessments for patients who missed ≥ 3 successive infusions before planned assessments at weeks 38 and 52, and some advanced visits (end-of-study/early-termination visits). These were remapped to the respective planned visits. To evaluate if remapping may have overestimated treatment effects, we conducted post hoc analyses using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures based on actual time points of assessments. In this post hoc analysis, estimated mean treatment difference between cipa + mig and alg + pbo for change from baseline to week 52 in 6MWD was 11.7 m (95% confidence interval [CI] - 1.0 to 24.4; p = 0.072). In the original published analyses, between-group difference using last observation carried forward was 13.6 m (95% CI - 2.8 to 29.9; p = 0.071 [p value from separate non-parametric analysis of covariance]). Both statistical analysis approaches led to similar results and consistent conclusions, confirming the efficacy of cipa + mig for adults with LOPD. NCT03729362; trial start date: December 4, 2018.Trial registration number.

References
1.
Cupler E, Berger K, Leshner R, Wolfe G, Han J, Barohn R . Consensus treatment recommendations for late-onset Pompe disease. Muscle Nerve. 2011; 45(3):319-33. PMC: 3534745. DOI: 10.1002/mus.22329. View

2.
Theunissen M, van den Elsen R, House T, Crittenden B, van Doorn P, van der Ploeg A . The impact of COVID-19 infection, the pandemic and its associated control measures on patients with Pompe disease. J Neurol. 2023; 271(1):32-45. PMC: 10769914. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11999-2. View

3.
Kashoki M, Hanaizi Z, Yordanova S, Vesely R, Bouygues C, Llinares J . A Comparison of EMA and FDA Decisions for New Drug Marketing Applications 2014-2016: Concordance, Discordance, and Why. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019; 107(1):195-202. PMC: 6977394. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1565. View

4.
Stevens D, Milani-Nejad S, Mozaffar T . Pompe Disease: a Clinical, Diagnostic, and Therapeutic Overview. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2023; 24(11):573-588. PMC: 10035871. DOI: 10.1007/s11940-022-00736-1. View

5.
Puertollano R, Raben N . New therapies for Pompe disease: are we closer to a cure?. Lancet Neurol. 2021; 20(12):973-975. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00358-6. View