» Articles » PMID: 39773282

Efficacy of Delivery of Care with Tele-continuous EEG in Critically Ill Patients: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (Tele-cRCT Study) Study

Abstract

Background: Continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) has been recommended in critically ill patients although its efficacy for improving patients' functional status remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of Tele-cEEG with Tele-routine EEG (Tele-rEEG), in terms of seizure detection rate, mortality and functional outcomes.

Methods: This study is a 3-year randomized, controlled, parallel, multicenter trial, conducted in eight regional hospitals across Thailand. Eligible participants were critically ill patients aged ≥ 15 years and at-risk for developing nonconvulsive seizure (NCS)/nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). Study interventions were 24-72 h Tele-cEEG versus 30-min Tele-rEEG. Study outcomes were seizure detection rate, mortality and functional outcomes (mRS), assessed at hospital discharge, ≤ 7 days, 3-, 6-, 9-months and 1 year.

Results: Two hundred and fifty-four patients were randomized, 128 and 126 patients received Tele-cEEG and Tele-rEEG, respectively. NCS/NCSE were detected more commonly in the Tele-cEEG (21.88%) than Tele-rEEG arm (14.29%) but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.116). Intention-to-treat, per-protocol and as-treated analysis showed non-significant differences in mortality at all assessment periods, with corresponding mortality rates of 10.03% (Tele-cEEG) versus 10.10% (Tele-rEEG) (p = 0.894), 9.67% versus 9.06% (p = 0.833) and 10.34% versus 9.06% (p = 0.600), respectively. Functional outcome was also not significantly different in all analyses.

Conclusions: Both Tele-cEEG and Tele-rEEG are feasible, although Tele-EEG requires additional EEG specialists, budget, and computational resources. While Tele-cEEG may help detect NCS/NCSE, this study had limited power to detect its efficacy in reducing mortality or improving functional outcomes. In limited-resource settings, Tele-rEEG approximating 30 min or longer offers a feasible and potentially valuable initial screening tool for critically ill patients at-risk of seizures. However, where Tele-cEEG is readily available, it remains the recommended approach. Trial registration Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TTCTR20181022002); Registered 22 October 2018.

References
1.
John C, Carabin H, Montano S, Bangirana P, Zunt J, Peterson P . Global research priorities for infections that affect the nervous system. Nature. 2015; 527(7578):S178-86. PMC: 4697933. DOI: 10.1038/nature16033. View

2.
Hill C, Blank L, Thibault D, Davis K, Dahodwala N, Litt B . Continuous EEG is associated with favorable hospitalization outcomes for critically ill patients. Neurology. 2018; 92(1):e9-e18. PMC: 6336162. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006689. View

3.
Hogan A, Brockman II C, Santa Maria A . Emergency department management of adults with infectious meningitis and encephalitis. Emerg Med Pract. 2022; 24(4):1-24. View

4.
Brigo F, Turcato G, Lattanzi S, Orlandi N, Turchi G, Zaboli A . Machine learning validation through decision tree analysis of the Epidemiology-Based Mortality Score in Status Epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2022; 63(10):2507-2518. PMC: 9804228. DOI: 10.1111/epi.17372. View

5.
Oshiro E, Walter K, Piantadosi S, Witham T, Tamargo R . A new subarachnoid hemorrhage grading system based on the Glasgow Coma Scale: a comparison with the Hunt and Hess and World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Scales in a clinical series. Neurosurgery. 1997; 41(1):140-7; discussion 147-8. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199707000-00029. View