» Articles » PMID: 39771693

Analytical Equations for the Prediction of the Failure Mode of Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joints Based on Interpretable Machine Learning and SHAP Values

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2025 Jan 8
PMID 39771693
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One of the most critical components of reinforced concrete structures are beam-column joint systems, which greatly affect the overall behavior of a structure during a major seismic event. According to modern design codes, if the system fails, it should fail due to the flexural yielding of the beam and not due to the shear failure of the joint. Thus, a reliable tool is required for the prediction of the failure mode of the joints in a preexisting population of structures. In the present paper, a novel methodology for the derivation of analytical equations for this task is presented. The formulation is based on SHapley Additive exPlanations values, which are commonly employed as an explainability tool in machine learning. Instead, in the present paper, they were also utilized as a transformed target variable to which the analytical curves were fitted, which approximated the predictions of an underlying machine learning model. A dataset comprising 478 experimental results was utilized and the eXtreme Gradient Boosting algorithm was initially fitted. This achieved an overall accuracy of ≈84%. The derived analytical equations achieved an accuracy of ≈78%. The corresponding metrics of precision, recall, and the F1-score ranged from ≈76% to ≈80% and were close across the two modes, indicating an unbiased model.

References
1.
Lundberg S, Erion G, Chen H, DeGrave A, Prutkin J, Nair B . From Local Explanations to Global Understanding with Explainable AI for Trees. Nat Mach Intell. 2020; 2(1):56-67. PMC: 7326367. DOI: 10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9. View

2.
Norton E, Dowd B . Log Odds and the Interpretation of Logit Models. Health Serv Res. 2017; 53(2):859-878. PMC: 5867187. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12712. View

3.
Jeong D, Kim S, Choi W, Ahn S . A Comparative Study on the Influence of Undersampling and Oversampling Techniques for the Classification of Physical Activities Using an Imbalanced Accelerometer Dataset. Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(7). PMC: 9319570. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10071255. View

4.
Linardatos P, Papastefanopoulos V, Kotsiantis S . Explainable AI: A Review of Machine Learning Interpretability Methods. Entropy (Basel). 2020; 23(1). PMC: 7824368. DOI: 10.3390/e23010018. View

5.
Fan J, Upadhye S, Worster A . Understanding receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. CJEM. 2006; 8(1):19-20. DOI: 10.1017/s1481803500013336. View