» Articles » PMID: 39771479

The Use of Tissue Concentrations of Biological and Small-Molecule Therapies in Clinical Studies of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Overview
Journal Pharmaceutics
Publisher MDPI
Date 2025 Jan 8
PMID 39771479
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The introduction of biological therapies has revolutionized inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management. A critical consideration in developing these therapies is ensuring adequate drug concentrations at the site of action. While blood-based biomarkers have shown limited utility in optimizing treatment (except for TNF-alpha inhibitors and thiopurines), tissue drug concentrations may offer valuable insights. In antimicrobial therapies, tissue concentration monitoring is standard practice and could provide a new avenue for understanding the pharmacokinetics of biological and small-molecule therapies in IBD. Various methods exist for measuring tissue concentrations, including whole tissue sampling, MALDI-MSI, microdialysis, and fluorescent labeling. These techniques offer unique advantages, such as spatial drug-distribution mapping, continuous sampling, or cellular-level analysis. However, challenges remain, including sampling invasiveness, heterogeneity in tissue compartments, and a lack of standardized bioanalytical guidelines. Drug pharmacokinetics are influenced by multiple factors, including molecular properties, disease-induced changes in the gastrointestinal tract, and the timing of sample collection. For example, drug permeability, solubility, and interaction with transporters may vary between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Research into the tissue concentrations of drugs like anti-TNF agents, ustekinumab, vedolizumab, and tofacitinib has shown variable correlations with clinical outcomes, suggesting potential roles for tissue concentration monitoring in therapeutic drug management. Although routine clinical application is not yet established, exploring tissue drug concentrations may enhance understanding of IBD pharmacotherapy.

References
1.
Kennelly J, Carlin S, Ju T, van der Veen J, Nelson R, Buteau J . Intestinal Phospholipid Disequilibrium Initiates an ER Stress Response That Drives Goblet Cell Necroptosis and Spontaneous Colitis in Mice. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 11(4):999-1021. PMC: 7898069. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2020.11.006. View

2.
Rana S, Sharma S, Malik A, Kaur J, Prasad K, Sinha S . Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and orocecal transit time in patients of inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2013; 58(9):2594-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-013-2694-x. View

3.
Poulsen N, Andersen V, Moller J, Moller H, Jessen F, Purup S . Comparative analysis of inflamed and non-inflamed colon biopsies reveals strong proteomic inflammation profile in patients with ulcerative colitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012; 12:76. PMC: 3441502. DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-76. View

4.
Zhang D, Hop C, Patilea-Vrana G, Gampa G, Seneviratne H, Unadkat J . Drug Concentration Asymmetry in Tissues and Plasma for Small Molecule-Related Therapeutic Modalities. Drug Metab Dispos. 2019; 47(10):1122-1135. PMC: 6756291. DOI: 10.1124/dmd.119.086744. View

5.
Van den Berghe N, Verstockt B, Gils A, Sabino J, Ferrante M, Vermeire S . Tissue Exposure does not Explain Non-Response in Ulcerative Colitis Patients with Adequate Serum Vedolizumab Concentrations. J Crohns Colitis. 2020; 15(6):988-993. DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa239. View