Continuous-plus-on-demand Epidural Infusion of Morphine for Postoperative Pain Relief by Means of a Small, Externally Worn Infusion Device
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
In this study, 50 patients received an initial bolus epidural injection of 2 mg morphine-hydrochloride followed by a continuous-plus-on-demand epidural infusion of a 0.25% morphine-hydrochloride solution by means of a small, externally worn infusion device, for constant pain relief after abdominal operations. Mean morphine consumption on the operation day (until 8:00 AM on the first postoperative day) was 4.8 +/- 0.2 mg, on the first postoperative day (until 8:00 AM on the second postoperative day) 1.9 +/- 0.2 mg, and on a second postoperative day until 8:00 PM, 0.6 +/- 0.1 mg. The mean morphine consumption over 50 h was 7.1 +/- 0.3 mg; in the first 25 h and in the following 25 h after the operation, 5.44 +/- 0.3 mg and the significantly lower amount of 1.64 +/- 0.2 mg morphine, respectively, were consumed (P less than 0.001). There were no serious side effects. Serum levels of free, unmetabolized morphine immunoreactivity decreased during the treatment. The described method is recommended for treating postoperative pain, as it offers constant analgesia and the possibility of individualized treatment.
Sakura S, Nonoue T, Nomura T, Nakatani T J Anesth. 2013; 8(3):277-83.
PMID: 23568112 DOI: 10.1007/BF02514650.
[Patient-controlled analgesia with subcutaneous opoids for out-patients with severe tumour pain.].
Goeke H, Herbst M Schmerz. 1993; 7(1):31-9.
PMID: 18415417 DOI: 10.1007/BF02527636.
Jage J, Portenoy R, Foley K Schmerz. 1990; 4(2):110-7.
PMID: 18415229 DOI: 10.1007/BF02527845.
Differences in the assessment of postoperative pain when evaluated by patients and doctors.
Sakura S, Nonoue T, Nomura T, Hara K, Iwakura H, Kosaka Y J Anesth. 1993; 7(3):287-92.
PMID: 15278813 DOI: 10.1007/s0054030070287.
Continuous epidural infusion for postoperative pain relief: a comparison of three regimens.
Sakura S, Uchida H, Saito Y, Asano M, Kosaka Y J Anesth. 1990; 4(2):138-44.
PMID: 15235998 DOI: 10.1007/s0054000040138.