Gut Microbiota Comparison in Rectal Swabs Versus Stool Samples in Cats with Kidney Stones

Overview

Journal Microorganisms

Specialty Microbiology

Date 2025 Jan 8

PMID 39770613

Authors

Patrick Joubran

Francoise A Roux

Matteo Serino

Jack-Yves Deschamps

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

To investigate the role of the intestinal bacterial microbiota in the pathogenesis of calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis in cats, a condition characterized by the formation of kidney stones, it is desirable to identify a sample collection method that accurately reflects the microbiota's composition. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of fecal sample collection methods on the intestinal microbiota composition in two cat populations: healthy cats and kidney stone-diseased cats. The study included eighteen cats from the same colony, comprising nine healthy cats and nine cats with spontaneously occurring presumed calcium oxalate kidney stones. Three fecal collection methods were compared: rectal swabs, the collection of fresh stool, and the collection of stool exposed to ambient air for 24 h. The bacterial microbiota was analyzed through the high-resolution sequencing of the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. For all cats, within the same individual, a one-way PERMANOVA analysis showed a significant difference between the rectal swabs and fresh stool ( = 0.0003), as well as between the rectal swabs and stool exposed to ambient air for 24 h ( = 0.0003), but no significant difference was identified between the fresh stool and non-fresh stool ( = 0.0651). When comparing the two populations of cats, this study provides seemingly conflicting results. (1) A principal component analysis (PCA) comparison revealed a significant difference in the bacterial composition between the healthy cats and the cats with kidney stones only when the sample was a fresh fecal sample ( = 0.0037). This finding suggests that the intestinal bacteria involved in the pathogenesis of kidney stones in cats are luminal and strictly anaerobic bacteria. Consequently, exposure to ambient air results in a loss of information, preventing the identification of dysbiosis. For clinical studies, non-fresh stool samples provided by owners does not appear suitable for studying the gut microbiota of cats with kidney stones; fresh stool should be favored. (2) Interestingly, the rectal swabs alone highlighted significant differences in the proportion of major phyla between the two populations. These findings highlight the critical importance of carefully selecting fecal collection methods when studying feline gut microbiota. Combining rectal swabs and fresh stool sampling provides complementary insights, offering the most accurate understanding of the gut microbiota composition in the context of feline kidney stone pathogenesis.

References

Hall J, Jackson M, Jewell D, Ephraim E . Chronic kidney disease in cats alters response of the plasma metabolome and fecal microbiome to dietary fiber. PLoS One. 2020; 15(7):e0235480. PMC: 7331996. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235480. View

Stern J, Moazami S, Qiu Y, Kurland I, Chen Z, Agalliu I . Evidence for a distinct gut microbiome in kidney stone formers compared to non-stone formers. Urolithiasis. 2016; 44(5):399-407. PMC: 8887828. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-016-0882-9. View

Bassis C, Moore N, Lolans K, Seekatz A, Weinstein R, Young V . Comparison of stool versus rectal swab samples and storage conditions on bacterial community profiles. BMC Microbiol. 2017; 17(1):78. PMC: 5374586. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-017-0983-9. View

Nowicki C, Ray L, Engen P, Madrigrano A, Witt T, Lad T . Comparison of gut microbiome composition in colonic biopsies, endoscopically-collected and at-home-collected stool samples. Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1148097. PMC: 10264612. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1148097. View

Coffey E, Gomez A, Burton E, Granick J, Lulich J, Furrow E . Characterization of the urogenital microbiome in Miniature Schnauzers with and without calcium oxalate urolithiasis. J Vet Intern Med. 2022; 36(4):1341-1352. PMC: 9308445. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.16482. View

Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M . Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 41(1):e1. PMC: 3592464. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks808. View

Gnanandarajah J, Abrahante J, Lulich J, Murtaugh M . Presence of Oxalobacter formigenes in the intestinal tract is associated with the absence of calcium oxalate urolith formation in dogs. Urol Res. 2012; 40(5):467-73. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-011-0451-1. View

Cannon A, Westropp J, Ruby A, Kass P . Evaluation of trends in urolith composition in cats: 5,230 cases (1985-2004). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007; 231(4):570-6. DOI: 10.2460/javma.231.4.570. View

Vemuri R, Gundamaraju R, Shinde T, Eri R . Therapeutic interventions for gut dysbiosis and related disorders in the elderly: antibiotics, probiotics or faecal microbiota transplantation?. Benef Microbes. 2016; 8(2):179-192. DOI: 10.3920/BM2016.0115. View

10.

Miller A, Oakeson K, Dale C, Dearing M . Microbial Community Transplant Results in Increased and Long-Term Oxalate Degradation. Microb Ecol. 2016; 72(2):470-8. PMC: 5155304. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-016-0800-2. View

11.

Jewell D, Tavener S, Hollar R, Panickar K . Metabolomic changes in cats with renal disease and calcium oxalate uroliths. Metabolomics. 2022; 18(8):68. PMC: 9374649. DOI: 10.1007/s11306-022-01925-4. View

12.

Jones R, Zhu X, Moan E, Murff H, Ness R, Seidner D . Inter-niche and inter-individual variation in gut microbial community assessment using stool, rectal swab, and mucosal samples. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):4139. PMC: 5841359. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-22408-4. View

13.

Ganz H, Jospin G, Rojas C, Martin A, Dahlhausen K, Kingsbury D . The Kitty Microbiome Project: Defining the Healthy Fecal "Core Microbiome" in Pet Domestic Cats. Vet Sci. 2022; 9(11). PMC: 9698023. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci9110635. View

14.

Pilla R, Suchodolski J . The Gut Microbiome of Dogs and Cats, and the Influence of Diet. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2021; 51(3):605-621. DOI: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2021.01.002. View

15.

Jha A, Shmalberg J, Tanprasertsuk J, Perry L, Massey D, Honaker R . Characterization of gut microbiomes of household pets in the United States using a direct-to-consumer approach. PLoS One. 2020; 15(2):e0227289. PMC: 7032713. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227289. View

16.

Lekcharoensuk C, Osborne C, Lulich J, Pusoonthornthum R, Kirk C, Ulrich L . Association between dietary factors and calcium oxalate and magnesium ammonium phosphate urolithiasis in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2001; 219(9):1228-37. DOI: 10.2460/javma.2001.219.1228. View

17.

Suchodolski J, Foster M, Sohail M, Leutenegger C, Queen E, Steiner J . The fecal microbiome in cats with diarrhea. PLoS One. 2015; 10(5):e0127378. PMC: 4437779. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127378. View

18.

Wolff B, Price T, Joyce C, Wolfe A, Mueller E . Oral probiotics and the female urinary microbiome: a double-blinded randomized placebo-controlled trial. Int Urol Nephrol. 2019; 51(12):2149-2159. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-019-02282-3. View

19.

Sung C, Marsilio S, Pilla R, Wu Y, Cavasin J, Hong M . Temporal Variability of the Dominant Fecal Microbiota in Healthy Adult Cats. Vet Sci. 2024; 11(1). PMC: 10819787. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci11010031. View

20.

Cammarota G, Ianiro G, Bibbo S, Gasbarrini A . Gut microbiota modulation: probiotics, antibiotics or fecal microbiota transplantation?. Intern Emerg Med. 2014; 9(4):365-73. DOI: 10.1007/s11739-014-1069-4. View