» Articles » PMID: 39770338

Effect of Lactic Acid Bacteria-Derived Postbiotic Supplementation on Tuberculosis in Wild Boar Populations

Overview
Journal Pathogens
Date 2025 Jan 8
PMID 39770338
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Eurasian wild boar () is a key wildlife host for tuberculosis (TB) in central and southwestern Spain, posing a challenge to TB eradication in livestock. New strategies, including the use of beneficial microbes, are being explored to mitigate wildlife diseases. This study evaluated the effect of oral supplementation with postbiotic antimycobacterial metabolites produced using Ingulados' lactic acid bacteria (LAB) collection on TB development in wild boar. A total of 20 game estates in mid-western Spain were divided into two groups: one fed with standard feed containing the postbiotic product and a control group fed without postbiotics. Data were collected from wild boar during hunting events pre- and post-supplementation. The presence of TB-like lesions (TBLLs), lesion severity and seropositivity against were assessed. Postbiotic supplementation led to a 36.87% reduction in TBLLs and a 35.94% decrease in seropositivity. Notably, young wild boar showed a 64.72% reduction in TBLLs and an 81.80% drop in seropositivity, suggesting reduced transmission. These findings support the potential of postbiotics as a safe, feasible and sustainable tool to control TB in wild boar, offering a promising addition to broader TB eradication efforts.

Citing Articles

Significant Detection of Porcine Circovirus 3 and Porcine Circovirus 4 in Wild Boars from Mid-Western Spain Without Apparent Sanitary Consequences.

Holgado-Martin R, Risco D, Ramos A, Martinez-Perez R, Garcia-Jimenez W, Hermoso-De Mendoza J Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(4).

PMID: 40003005 PMC: 11852179. DOI: 10.3390/ani15040523.

References
1.
Koutsoumanis K, Allende A, Alvarez-Ordonez A, Bolton D, Bover-Cid S, Chemaly M . Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 15: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2021. EFSA J. 2022; 20(1):e07045. PMC: 8792879. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7045. View

2.
Byrne A, Allen A, OBrien D, Miller M . Editorial: Bovine Tuberculosis-International Perspectives on Epidemiology and Management. Front Vet Sci. 2019; 6:202. PMC: 6603197. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00202. View

3.
Aranaz A, de Juan L, Montero N, Sanchez C, Galka M, Delso C . Bovine tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) in wildlife in Spain. J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42(6):2602-8. PMC: 427808. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.6.2602-2608.2004. View

4.
Welsh M, Cunningham R, Corbett D, Girvin R, McNair J, Skuce R . Influence of pathological progression on the balance between cellular and humoral immune responses in bovine tuberculosis. Immunology. 2004; 114(1):101-11. PMC: 1782060. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2004.02003.x. View

5.
Clausi M, Ciambrone L, Zanoni M, Costanzo N, Pacciarini M, Casalinuovo F . Evaluation of the Presence and Viability of in Wild Boar Meat and Meat-Based Preparations. Foods. 2021; 10(10). PMC: 8535965. DOI: 10.3390/foods10102410. View