» Articles » PMID: 39769630

Assessment of Change in Enamel Color and Surface Hardness Following the Use of ICON Resin Infiltration and Remineralizing Agent: An In Vitro Study

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2025 Jan 8
PMID 39769630
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the change in enamel color and surface micro-hardness following the use of resin-infiltration concept material (ICON) and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium fluoride phosphate (CPP-ACFP) remineralizing agent. Fifty-four extracted human third molars were collected and randomly divided into three groups: group A: control with no surface treatment; group B: treated using ICON; and group C: treated using CPP-ACFP. The change in color and micro-hardness of the enamel surface were measured using spectrophotometer and Vickers hardness number, respectively. The measurements were taken at three timelines; baseline (BL), after demineralization (DM), and after surface treatment (TX). The three groups showed no significant differences in enamel color change after demineralization ( < 0.05). However, after surface treatment in relation to the baseline, groups B and C had a significant increase in color change compared to the control group ( < 0.05), and group B showed a statistically significant increase in enamel color changes compared to group C. Additionally, all groups exhibited a significant reduction in enamel micro-hardness after demineralization in comparison to their baseline ( < 0.05). Group C showed a significant increase in micro-hardness after surface treatment compared to groups A and B ( < 0.05), while group B showed a significant decrease in enamel micro-hardness compared to groups A and C ( < 0.05). These findings suggest that teeth treated with CPP-amorphous calcium fluoride phosphate (CPP-ACFP) show a significant improvement in enamel surface color after demineralization compared to the teeth treated with resin infiltration (ICON) and the non-treated teeth. Additionally, enamel surfaces treated with CPP-ACFP show significant enamel hardness regaining, while resin infiltration (ICON) compromises enamel surface hardness.

References
1.
Bhat D, Awchat K, Singh P, Jha M, Arora K, Mitra M . Evaluation of Remineralizing Potential of CPP-ACP, CPP-ACP + F and β TCP + F and Their Effect on Microhardness of Enamel Using Vickers Microhardness Test: An Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022; 15(Suppl 2):S221-S225. PMC: 9108832. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2161. View

2.
Borges A, Caneppele T, Masterson D, Maia L . Is resin infiltration an effective esthetic treatment for enamel development defects and white spot lesions? A systematic review. J Dent. 2016; 56:11-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.10.010. View

3.
Gurdogan E, Ozdemir-Ozenen D, Sandalli N . Evaluation of Surface Roughness Characteristics Using Atomic Force Microscopy and Inspection of Microhardness Following Resin Infiltration with Icon. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017; 29(3):201-208. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12279. View

4.
Paris S, Schwendicke F, Keltsch J, Dorfer C, Meyer-Lueckel H . Masking of white spot lesions by resin infiltration in vitro. J Dent. 2013; 41 Suppl 5:e28-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.04.003. View

5.
Baysal A, Uysal T . Do enamel microabrasion and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate affect shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to a demineralized enamel surface?. Angle Orthod. 2011; 82(1):36-41. PMC: 8881024. DOI: 10.2319/041211-265.1. View