» Articles » PMID: 39769142

Beyond the "Dominant" and "Recessive" Patterns of Inheritance

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2025 Jan 8
PMID 39769142
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to investigate whether genes with different modes of inheritance differ in the presence of promoter-enriched CGI loci. For each autosomal chromosome, the author searched for variations in the total number of diseases' phenotypes with autosomal dominant (AD) and recessive (AR) inheritance for a list of promoter-poor CGI (CGI-) and promoter-enriched CGI (CGI+) genes using the OMIM database. Then, the CGI- and CGI+ genes displaying random allelic or bi-allelic expression were examined. The author evaluated whether there was a distinct distribution of AD and AR diseases in the groups of chromosomes based on their SNP hotspot density. The same analysis was conducted for the X chromosome. The SPSS statistical package was utilized. The distribution of AD and AR diseases between CGI- and CGI+ bi-allelic genes significantly differed in autosomal chromosomes 6 and 17, which show intermediate SNP hotspot density. Additionally, a statistically significant difference was observed in AD and AR diseases in the remaining autosomal chromosomes with low SNP hotspots between their randomly allelic expressed CGI- and CGI+ genes. Specifically, AD diseases were related to CGI- genes, while AR diseases were associated with CGI+ genes. In the X chromosome, X-linked dominant (XLD) diseases were mainly found in CGI+ genes, and X-linked recessive (XLR) diseases were found in CGI- genes, regardless of the X-inactivation process. It is essential to study inheritance and classify genetic variants in a more stochastic way than the terms "Dominant" and "Recessive," and their derivatives, such as "Codominant" and "Incomplete Dominant," are applied in Mendelian and non-Mendelian inheritance. This concept may further explain the "Reduced Penetrance" and "Variable Expressivity" in certain human diseases. All the above suggests a need to reassess how genetic and epigenetic data are studied and utilized for genetic counseling or precision medicine.

References
1.
Robertson K . DNA methylation and human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2005; 6(8):597-610. DOI: 10.1038/nrg1655. View

2.
Kravitz S, Ferris E, Love M, Thomas A, Quinlan A, Gregg C . Random allelic expression in the adult human body. Cell Rep. 2023; 42(1):111945. PMC: 10484211. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111945. View

3.
Hartono S, Korf I, Chedin F . GC skew is a conserved property of unmethylated CpG island promoters across vertebrates. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43(20):9729-41. PMC: 4787789. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv811. View

4.
Pertille F, da Silva V, Johansson A, Lindstrom T, Wright D, Coutinho L . Mutation dynamics of CpG dinucleotides during a recent event of vertebrate diversification. Epigenetics. 2019; 14(7):685-707. PMC: 6557589. DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2019.1609868. View

5.
Roy D, Calaf G, Hei T . Frequent allelic imbalance on chromosome 6 and 17 correlate with radiation-induced neoplastic transformation of human breast epithelial cells. Carcinogenesis. 2001; 22(10):1685-92. DOI: 10.1093/carcin/22.10.1685. View