Laser-Based Length-Measuring Board for the Measurement of Infant Body Length from Outside an Incubator: Proposal and Assessment of a Model

Overview

Journal Children (Basel)

Specialty Health Services

Date 2025 Jan 8

PMID 39767973

Authors

Luis Pereira-da-Silva

Rafael B Henriques

Daniel Virella

Andreia Mascarenhas

Ana Luisa Papoila

Marta Alves

Horacio Fernandes

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Opening the incubator side wall to insert a non-sterile length-measuring device carries the risk of microbial contamination and thermal instability for preterm infants. To reduce this inconvenience, a laser-based length-measuring board is proposed to measure body length from outside the incubator.

Methods: This device has two laser-line-shaped cursors which can be pointed to opposite ends of a segment to be measured. It is attached to the outer side of one of the incubator's side walls in such a manner as to ensure that its axis is parallel to the longitudinal axis of the segment. To validate the measurements made with this model, a calibrated caliper consisting of a conventional rigid length-measuring board with a resolution of 0.05 mm was constructed to serve as a reference. Crown-heel length was measured in a sample of 45 infants, including 32 preterm and 13 term infants of corrected gestational age at the time of measurement.

Results: Good intra-observer variability was obtained. Near-perfect statistical agreement was found between measurements with both devices, with concordance correlation coefficients of 0.994 (95% CI: 0.990; 0.996) in preterm infants and 0.994 (95% CI: 0.988, 0.998) in infants at term. The clinical relevance of the agreement between measurements was assessed by a Bland-Altman plot, and the difference may reach clinical relevance (up to 1 cm) but without evidence of proportional bias.

Conclusion: The proposed validated laser-based length-measuring board offers a suitable alternative to conventional length-measuring boards for contactless measurement of infant body length.

References

Brennan A, Murphy B, Kiely M . Optimising preterm nutrition: present and future. Proc Nutr Soc. 2016; 75(2):154-61. DOI: 10.1017/S0029665116000136. View

Shinwell E, Shlomo M . Measured length of normal term infants changes over the first two days of life. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2003; 16(4):537-40. DOI: 10.1515/jpem.2003.16.4.537. View

Pereira-da-Silva L, Virella D, Fusch C . Nutritional Assessment in Preterm Infants: A Practical Approach in the NICU. Nutrients. 2019; 11(9). PMC: 6770216. DOI: 10.3390/nu11091999. View

Carrasco J, Jover L . Estimating the generalized concordance correlation coefficient through variance components. Biometrics. 2004; 59(4):849-58. DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2003.00099.x. View

Ismail L, Puglia F, Ohuma E, Ash S, Bishop D, Carew R . Precision of recumbent crown-heel length when using an infantometer. BMC Pediatr. 2016; 16(1):186. PMC: 5109659. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-016-0725-4. View

Bartsch D, Muftuoglu I, Freeman W . Laser Pointers Revisited. Retina. 2016; 36(9):1611-3. PMC: 4993644. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001253. View

Ramel S, Zhang L, Misra S, Anderson C, Demerath E . Do anthropometric measures accurately reflect body composition in preterm infants?. Pediatr Obes. 2016; 12 Suppl 1:72-77. DOI: 10.1111/ijpo.12181. View

van Gils R, Wauben L, Helder O . Body size measuring techniques enabling stress-free growth monitoring of extreme preterm infants inside incubators: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2022; 17(4):e0267285. PMC: 9033282. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267285. View

Crofton P, Shrivastava A, Wade J, Stephen R, Kelnar C, Lyon A . Bone and collagen markers in preterm infants: relationship with growth and bone mineral content over the first 10 weeks of life. Pediatr Res. 1999; 46(5):581-7. DOI: 10.1203/00006450-199911000-00015. View

10.

Koo W, Walters J, Hockman E . Body composition in human infants at birth and postnatally. J Nutr. 2000; 130(9):2188-94. DOI: 10.1093/jn/130.9.2188. View

11.

Hermanussen M, Seele K . Mini-knemometry: an accurate technique for lower leg length measurements in early childhood. Ann Hum Biol. 1997; 24(4):307-13. DOI: 10.1080/03014469700005052. View

12.

Folger L, Panchal P, Eglovitch M, Whelan R, Lee A . Diagnostic accuracy of neonatal foot length to identify preterm and low birthweight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2020; 5(11). PMC: 7677351. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002976. View

13.

Ballard J, Khoury J, WEDIG K, Wang L, Lipp R . New Ballard Score, expanded to include extremely premature infants. J Pediatr. 1991; 119(3):417-23. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)82056-6. View

14.

Johnson M, Wiskin A, Pearson F, Beattie R, Leaf A . How to use: nutritional assessment in neonates. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2014; 100(3):147-54. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306448. View

15.

Rannisto S, Paalanne N, Rannisto P, Haapanen A, Oksaoja S, Uitti J . Measurement of leg-length discrepancy using laser-based ultrasound method. Acta Radiol. 2011; 52(10):1143-6. DOI: 10.1258/ar.2011.110268. View

16.

Belfort M, Gillman M, Buka S, Casey P, McCormick M . Preterm infant linear growth and adiposity gain: trade-offs for later weight status and intelligence quotient. J Pediatr. 2013; 163(6):1564-1569.e2. PMC: 3834090. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.06.032. View

17.

Ribeiro D, Sasinski J, Hackett H, Manalo C, Choi J, Miller P . Comparison of Infant Length Measurements Using Tape Measure Versus Length Board. Adv Neonatal Care. 2023; 23(5):435-441. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000001098. View

18.

Griffin I, Pang N, Perring J, Cooke R . Knee-heel length measurement in healthy preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1999; 81(1):F50-5. PMC: 1720961. DOI: 10.1136/fn.81.1.f50. View

19.

Collins A, Weitkamp J, Wynn J . Why are preterm newborns at increased risk of infection?. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018; 103(4):F391-F394. PMC: 6013388. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313595. View

20.

Pereira-da-Silva L, Virella D . Accurate Direct Measures Are Required to Validate Derived Measures. Neonatology. 2018; 113(3):266. DOI: 10.1159/000485667. View