» Articles » PMID: 39767766

IL-6R Inhibitors and Gastrointestinal Perforations: A Pharmacovigilance Study and a Predicting Nomogram

Overview
Journal Biomedicines
Date 2025 Jan 8
PMID 39767766
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

IL-6R inhibitors are widely used in many inflammation-related diseases, especially so during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, their relationship with gastrointestinal perforations (GIPs) has been reported more and more. We comprehensively analyzed IL-6R inhibitors in association with GIPs from the United States FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). A disproportionate analysis was used to quantify the signals of GIPs caused by IL-6R inhibitors using two algorithms, and we assessed the risk using logistic regression analysis. We also established a risk prediction model of GIPs. We identified 994 cases with GIPs of IL-6R inhibitors (tocilizumab and sarilumab) from the FAERS database. The GIPs signals of IL-6R inhibitors were significant, including tocilizumab (reporting odds ratio [ROR] 6.86, 95%CI 6.43-7.31) and sarilumab (ROR 4.03, 95%CI 2.83-5.73). Duodenal perforation had the strongest signals of tocilizumab ( = 312; ROR 19.45, 95%CI 17.33-21.83; IC 3.72) and sarilumab ( = 14; ROR 9.57, 95%CI 5.66-16.17; IC 1.92). The median time to GIPs was near 60 days. In total, 71% of the cases occurred within the first six months after tocilizumab treatment. After excluding missing data, we found that independent risk factors included female (OR 1.52, 95%CI 1.16-1.98), ≥40 years (OR 5.63, 95%CI 1.78-17.78), glucocorticoids (OR 1.37, 95%CI 1.10-1.72), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, OR 3.46, 95%CI 2.77-4.32). The risk prediction model showed good discrimination and clinical applicability in both the training (AUC, 0.73) and validation (AUC, 0.75) sets. IL-6R inhibitors may increase the risk of GIPs, especially female, middle-aged patients, IL-6R inhibitors, NSAIDs, and glucocorticoids. Therefore, we suggest that these factors associated with gastrointestinal reactions should be considered during treatment.

References
1.
Hu J, Sun Y, Zuo X, Zou Y . Assessment of adverse events related to anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibodies using the FDA adverse event reporting system: a real-world pharmacovigilance study. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2024; 23(10):1327-1339. DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2382227. View

2.
Burmester G, Strand V, Kivitz A, Hu C, Wang S, van Hoogstraten H . Long-term safety and efficacy of sarilumab with or without background csDMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023; 62(10):3268-3279. PMC: 10547516. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead062. View

3.
Wichelmann T, Abdulmujeeb S, Ehrenpreis E . Bevacizumab and gastrointestinal perforations: a review from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021; 54(10):1290-1297. DOI: 10.1111/apt.16601. View

4.
Whiles B, Reich D, Green J, Yu F, Bird V . Evaluation of fear, willingness to seek care, and healthcare delivery preferences for patients with nephrolithiasis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Transl Androl Urol. 2024; 13(6):962-969. PMC: 11228673. DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-627. View

5.
Giles J, Sattar N, Gabriel S, Ridker P, Gay S, Warne C . Cardiovascular Safety of Tocilizumab Versus Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 72(1):31-40. DOI: 10.1002/art.41095. View