» Articles » PMID: 39767517

Virtual Care Appointments and Experience Among Older Rural Patients with Chronic Conditions in New South Wales: An Analysis of Existing Survey Data

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2025 Jan 8
PMID 39767517
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This retrospective, descriptive study, conducted in 2024, analysed Virtual Care Survey (2020-2022) data of patients' self-reported reflections on use and experiences to investigate relationships between demographics, the number of chronic conditions, and virtual care use among older rural patients (≥65 years with at least one chronic condition) living in New South Wales, and their satisfaction with virtual care. Associations between categorical variables were assessed using chi-squared tests, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for continuous variables. Qualitative feedback was analysed thematically. The study included 264 patients (median age 74 years; 51.1% women). Most virtual care appointments (65.3%) were for consultations, check-ups, or review of test results. Over one-third (38.3%) of the patients had multimorbidity and were 1.8 times more likely to have five or more virtual care appointments compared to the patients with one chronic condition. The oldest age group (≥80 years) preferred telephone over online mediums (Skype or Zoom) ( < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was high (65.8%), with 60.9% finding virtual care comparable to in-person consultations. Technological issues correlated with more negative experiences ( < 0.05). Key themes were enhanced accessibility and convenience, quality and safety of virtual care, and recommendations for equitable access. Despite positive responses, addressing technological complexities is important for optimising virtual care models for older rural Australians with chronic conditions.

References
1.
Alhaddad A, Aly H, Gad H, Al-Ali A, Sadasivuni K, Cabibihan J . Sense and Learn: Recent Advances in Wearable Sensing and Machine Learning for Blood Glucose Monitoring and Trend-Detection. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:876672. PMC: 9135106. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.876672. View

2.
Ilioudi S, Lazakidou A, Tsironi M . Information and communication technologies for better patient self-management and self-efficacy. Int J Electron Healthc. 2010; 5(4):327-39. DOI: 10.1504/IJEH.2010.036205. View

3.
Mathew S, Fitts M, Liddle Z, Bourke L, Campbell N, Murakami-Gold L . Telehealth in remote Australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations?. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):341. PMC: 10074370. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09265-2. View

4.
Tenfelde K, Bol N, Schoonman G, Bunt J, Antheunis M . Exploring the impact of patient, physician and technology factors on patient video consultation satisfaction. Digit Health. 2023; 9:20552076231203887. PMC: 10540607. DOI: 10.1177/20552076231203887. View

5.
Chowdhury S, Sunna T, Ahmed S . Telemedicine is an important aspect of healthcare services amid COVID-19 outbreak: Its barriers in Bangladesh and strategies to overcome. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2020; 36(1):4-12. DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3064. View