Understanding Reactions to Informative Process Model Interventions: Ambivalence As a Mechanism of Change

Overview

Journal Behav Sci (Basel)

Date 2025 Jan 8

PMID 39767293

Authors

Nimrod Rosler

Ori Wiener-Blotner

Orel Heskiau Micheles

Keren Sharvit

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Transforming the course of protracted and bloody conflicts requires changing the behaviors and minds of society members who take part in these conflicts. While studies examining the psychology of such societies point to the barriers that conflict-supporting narratives create for changing minds and behavior, a novel psychological intervention offers a new direction to facilitate openness for attitude change based on the Information Process Model (IPM). Previous studies indicated the effectiveness of this intervention in creating an unfreezing of conflict attitudes and increasing support for peace negotiation in different conflict areas. However, since the psychological process underlying its effectiveness remains underexplored, the aim of the current research is to examine the experiences of participants exposed to IPM-based messages and the role of cognitive and emotional ambivalence in facilitating the unfreezing of conflict-supporting narrative and contemplating alternative beliefs. The first study (n = 234) examines how IPM (vs. control) videos increase engagement with and ambivalence towards conflict-supporting narratives using quantitative and qualitative analysis of written Decisional Balance responses. The second study (n = 24) delves into the expressions of cognitive and emotional ambivalence following exposure to different segments of an IPM video using semi-structured interviews, and further assesses their potential influence on facilitating contemplation with newly provided information.

References

Velicer W, DiClemente C, Prochaska J, Brandenburg N . Decisional balance measure for assessing and predicting smoking status. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985; 48(5):1279-89. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.48.5.1279. View

Park M, An B . Comparison of the Predictors of Smoking Cessation Plans between Adolescent Conventional Cigarette Smokers and E-Cigarette Smokers Using the Transtheoretical Model. Children (Basel). 2024; 11(5). PMC: 11119963. DOI: 10.3390/children11050598. View

Wang Z, Ali S, Akbar A, Rasool F . Determining the Influencing Factors of Biogas Technology Adoption Intention in Pakistan: The Moderating Role of Social Media. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(7). PMC: 7177697. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17072311. View

Hakim N, Abi-Ghannam G, Saab R, Albzour M, Zebian Y, Adams G . Turning the lens in the study of precarity: On experimental social psychology's acquiescence to the settler-colonial status quo in historic Palestine. Br J Soc Psychol. 2022; 62 Suppl 1:21-38. PMC: 10099254. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12595. View

Patton M . Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res. 1999; 34(5 Pt 2):1189-208. PMC: 1089059. View

Kteily N, Bruneau E, Waytz A, Cotterill S . The ascent of man: Theoretical and empirical evidence for blatant dehumanization. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015; 109(5):901-31. DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000048. View

Doran E, Doidge M, Aytur S, Wilson R . Understanding farmers' conservation behavior over time: A longitudinal application of the transtheoretical model of behavior change. J Environ Manage. 2022; 323:116136. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116136. View

Wang L, Chen H, Lu H, Wang Y, Liu C, Dong X . The effect of transtheoretical model-lead intervention for knee osteoarthritis in older adults: a cluster randomized trial. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020; 22(1):134. PMC: 7278156. DOI: 10.1186/s13075-020-02222-y. View

Peterson J, Flanders J . Complexity management theory: motivation for ideological rigidity and social conflict. Cortex. 2002; 38(3):429-58. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70680-4. View

10.

Ben-Ezer I, Rosler N, Sharvit K, Wiener-Blotner O, Bar-Tal D, Nasie M . From acceptance to change: The role of acceptance in the effectiveness of the Informative Process Model for conflict resolution. Br J Soc Psychol. 2024; . DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12802. View

11.

Prochaska J, Velicer W, Rossi J, Goldstein M, Marcus B, Rakowski W . Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychol. 1994; 13(1):39-46. DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.13.1.39. View

12.

Eidelson R, Eidelson J . Dangerous ideas. Five beliefs that propel groups toward conflict. Am Psychol. 2003; 58(3):182-92. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.58.3.182. View

13.

Staub E . The roots of evil: social conditions, culture, personality, and basic human needs. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2005; 3(3):179-92. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_2. View

14.

Kruglanski A, Webster D . Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". Psychol Rev. 1996; 103(2):263-83. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.103.2.263. View

15.

Clark P . Toward a transtheoretical model of interprofessional education: stages, processes and forces supporting institutional change. J Interprof Care. 2012; 27(1):43-9. DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2012.730074. View

16.

Paluck E, Porat R, Clark C, Green D . Prejudice Reduction: Progress and Challenges. Annu Rev Psychol. 2020; 72:533-560. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-071620-030619. View

17.

Prochaska J, DiClemente C . Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983; 51(3):390-5. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.51.3.390. View

18.

Smith C, Ellsworth P . Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985; 48(4):813-38. View

19.

Rosler N, Sharvit K, Hameiri B, Wiener-Blotner O, Idan O, Bar-Tal D . The Informative Process Model as a New Intervention for Attitude Change in Intractable Conflicts: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Front Psychol. 2022; 13:946410. PMC: 9361850. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.946410. View

20.

Bekhet A, Zauszniewski J . Methodological triangulation: an approach to understanding data. Nurse Res. 2013; 20(2):40-3. DOI: 10.7748/nr2012.11.20.2.40.c9442. View