» Articles » PMID: 39766780

B Chromosome Transcriptional Inactivation in the Spermatogenesis of the Grasshopper

Overview
Journal Genes (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Date 2025 Jan 8
PMID 39766780
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/objectives: We analyzed the relationship between synapsis, recombination, and transcription during the spermatogenesis of the grasshopper carrying B chromosomes (type B1).

Methods: The progression of synapsis was interpreted according to the dynamics of the cohesin subunit SMC3 axes. DNA double-strand breaks were revealed by RAD51 immunolabeling, while transcriptional activity was determined by the presence of RNA polymerase II phosphorylated at serine 2 (pRNApol II) immunolabeling. The two repressive epigenetic modifications, histone H3 methylated at lysine 9 (H3K9me3) and histone H2AX phosphorylated at serine 139 (γ-H2AX), were employed to reveal transcriptional inactivity.

Results: During prophase I, spermatocytes with one B1 chromosome showed overall transcription except in the regions occupied by both the X and the B1 chromosomes. This transcriptional inactivity was accompanied by the accumulation of repressive epigenetic modifications. When two B1 chromosomes were present, they could appear as a fully synapsed monochiasmatic bivalent, showing intense H3K9me3 labeling and absence of pRNApol II, while γ-H2AX labeling was similar to that shown by the autosomes.

Conclusions: According to our results, B1 transcriptional inactivation was triggered in spermatogonia, long before the beginning of meiosis, and was accompanied by H3K9me3 heterochromatinization that was maintained throughout spermatogenesis. Moreover, when two B1 were present, the transcriptional inactivation did not preclude synapsis and recombination achievement by these chromosomes.

References
1.
Viera A, Parra M, Arevalo S, Garcia de la Vega C, Santos J, Page J . X Chromosome Inactivation during Grasshopper Spermatogenesis. Genes (Basel). 2021; 12(12). PMC: 8700825. DOI: 10.3390/genes12121844. View

2.
Schimenti J . Synapsis or silence. Nat Genet. 2004; 37(1):11-3. DOI: 10.1038/ng0105-11. View

3.
Abe H, Yeh Y, Munakata Y, Ishiguro K, Andreassen P, Namekawa S . Active DNA damage response signaling initiates and maintains meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):7212. PMC: 9705562. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34295-5. View

4.
Pang A, Johnson W, Ravindranath N, Dym M, Rennert O, Chan W . Expression profiling of purified male germ cells: stage-specific expression patterns related to meiosis and postmeiotic development. Physiol Genomics. 2005; 24(2):75-85. DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00215.2004. View

5.
Solari A . Equalization of Z and W axes in chicken and quail oocytes. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1992; 59(1):52-6. DOI: 10.1159/000133199. View