» Articles » PMID: 39766458

Positive and Negative Affect Differentially Predict Individual Differences and Intra-Individual Changes in Daily Cognitive Failures in Younger and Older Adults

Overview
Journal Brain Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2025 Jan 8
PMID 39766458
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

(1) Background: Cognitive failures, including lapses in attention, memory, and executive functioning, can negatively affect daily performance and well-being. Negative and positive affectivity have been implicated in cognitive functioning, yet their relationship with cognitive failures remains underexplored. This study investigates the impact of positive and negative affect on cognitive failures, using daily diary methods to examine both within-person and between-person associations in a sample of younger adults from Singapore and adults across the lifespan from the United States (US). (2) Methods: Participants (Singapore: = 253, US: = 1726) completed daily diaries over seven (Singapore) or eight (US) consecutive days. Multilevel modelling was used to analyse both within- and between-person relationships between affect and cognitive failures, controlling for demographic and socioeconomic variables. (3) Results: In both the Singapore and US samples, negative affect was consistently positively associated with cognitive failures at both levels (SG within-person: β = 0.21, < 0.001; SG between-person: β = 0.58, < 0.001; US within-person: β = 0.08, < 0.001; US between-person: β = 0.28, < 0.001), supporting the influence of negative affective experiences on cognitive lapses. However, positive affect showed no significant associations with daily cognitive failures in the Singapore sample (within-person: β = 0.01, = 0.683; between-person: β = -0.04, = 0.484) and only a between-person negative association in the US sample (within-person: β = 0.02, = 0.157; between-person: β = -0.11, < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: These findings suggest that positive and negative affect differentially influence individual differences and intra-individual changes in daily cognitive failures among both younger and older adults.

References
1.
BLESS H, Schwarz N, CLORE G, Golisano V, Rabe C, Wolk M . Mood and the use of scripts: does a happy mood really lead to mindlessness?. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996; 71(4):665-79. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.4.665. View

2.
Ng T, Majeed N, Lua V, Hartanto A . Do executive functions buffer against COVID-19 stress?: A latent variable approach. Curr Psychol. 2023; :1-17. PMC: 10163301. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-023-04652-8. View

3.
Allahyari T, Nasl Saraji G, Adl J, Hosseini M, Iravani M, Younesian M . Cognitive failures, driving errors and driving accidents. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2008; 14(2):149-58. DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2008.11076759. View

4.
Payne T, Schnapp M . The Relationship between Negative Affect and Reported Cognitive Failures. Depress Res Treat. 2014; 2014:396195. PMC: 3942281. DOI: 10.1155/2014/396195. View

5.
McVay J, Kane M, Kwapil T . Tracking the train of thought from the laboratory into everyday life: an experience-sampling study of mind wandering across controlled and ecological contexts. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009; 16(5):857-63. PMC: 2760023. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.857. View