» Articles » PMID: 39766073

Circulating Tumor DNA for Prediction of Complete Pathological Response to Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (NEORECT Trial)

Abstract

Background/objectives: Locally advanced rectal cancer is treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). As this approach achieves complete pathologic remissions (pCR) in approximately 30% of patients, it raises the question of whether surgery is always necessary. Non-surgical strategies, such as "watch and wait" (W&W), have shown similarly promising outcomes. However, there is an unmet need for reliable biomarkers predicting pCR. Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown potential for monitoring treatment response and detecting minimal residual disease. We hypothesized that monitoring ctDNA changes during nCRT might facilitate the identification of individuals who achieve pCR.

Methods: In the prospective single-center NEORECT trial, the plasma of forty rectal cancer patients was collected before, during, and after nCRT and before TME. Informative somatic mutations were identified in tissue biopsies by NGS and subsequently used for ctDNA quantification by dPCR.

Results: The results identified three distinct ctDNA patterns: increase, decrease, and absence. Remarkably, undetectable DNA was observed in good responders, while a tenfold ctDNA increase was associated with the emergence of new metastases. Despite these insights, ctDNA alone demonstrated low specificity, with no significant correlation to pCR or long-term prognosis. A multimodal approach incorporating routinely available clinical parameters remains inadequate for accurately predicting pCR prior to TME.

Conclusions: In conclusion, the NEORECT trial establishes the feasibility of ctDNA-based personalized monitoring for rectal cancer patients undergoing nCRT. However, the utility of ctDNA in enhancing pCR prediction for a W&W strategy warrants further investigation. Larger studies integrating multi-gene analyses and expanded clinical datasets are essential in the future.

References
1.
Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R . Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(17):1731-40. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa040694. View

2.
Norcic G . Liquid Biopsy in Colorectal Cancer-Current Status and Potential Clinical Applications. Micromachines (Basel). 2018; 9(6). PMC: 6187650. DOI: 10.3390/mi9060300. View

3.
Dayde D, Tanaka I, Jain R, Tai M, Taguchi A . Predictive and Prognostic Molecular Biomarkers for Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Rectal Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 18(3). PMC: 5372589. DOI: 10.3390/ijms18030573. View

4.
Bakke K, Hole K, Dueland S, Groholt K, Flatmark K, Ree A . Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of rectal cancer: tumour volume and perfusion fraction predict chemoradiotherapy response and survival. Acta Oncol. 2017; 56(6):813-818. DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1287951. View

5.
Wang Y, Yang L, Bao H, Fan X, Xia F, Wan J . Utility of ctDNA in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and prognosis assessment in locally advanced rectal cancer: A prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2021; 18(8):e1003741. PMC: 8407540. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003741. View