» Articles » PMID: 39762534

Development and Validation of an Algorithm for Identifying Patients Undergoing Dialysis from Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease

Abstract

Background: Identifying patients on dialysis among those with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 15 mL/min/1.73 m remains challenging. To facilitate clinical research in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) using electronic health records, we aimed to develop algorithms to identify dialysis patients using laboratory data obtained in routine practice.

Methods: We collected clinical data of patients with an eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m from six clinical research core hospitals across Japan: four hospitals for the derivation cohort and two for the validation cohort. The candidate factors for the classification models were identified using logistic regression with stepwise backward selection. To ensure transplant patients were not included in the non-dialysis population, we excluded individuals with the disease code Z94.0.

Results: We collected data from 1142 patients, with 640 (56%) currently undergoing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis (PD), including 426 of 763 patients in the derivation cohort and 214 of 379 patients in the validation cohort. The prescription of PD solutions perfectly identified patients undergoing dialysis. After excluding patients prescribed PD solutions, seven laboratory parameters were included in the algorithm. The areas under the receiver operation characteristic curve were 0.95 and 0.98 and the positive and negative predictive values were 90.9% and 91.4% in the derivation cohort and 96.2% and 94.6% in the validation cohort, respectively. The calibrations were almost linear.

Conclusions: We identified patients on dialysis among those with an eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73 m. This study paves the way for database research in nephrology, especially for patients with non-dialysis-dependent advanced CKD.

References
1.
Levey A, Inker L, Matsushita K, Greene T, Willis K, Lewis E . GFR decline as an end point for clinical trials in CKD: a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation and the US Food and Drug Administration. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014; 64(6):821-35. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.07.030. View

2.
Inker L, Heerspink H, Tighiouart H, Levey A, Coresh J, Gansevoort R . GFR Slope as a Surrogate End Point for Kidney Disease Progression in Clinical Trials: A Meta-Analysis of Treatment Effects of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019; 30(9):1735-1745. PMC: 6727261. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2019010007. View

3.
Yanagita M, Muto S, Nishiyama H, Ando Y, Hirata S, Doi K . Clinical questions and good practice statements of clinical practice guidelines for management of kidney injury during anticancer drug therapy 2022. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2023; 28(2):85-122. PMC: 10808569. DOI: 10.1007/s10157-023-02415-0. View

4.
Imaizumi T, Hamano T, Fujii N, Huang J, Xie D, Ricardo A . Cardiovascular disease history and β-blocker prescription patterns among Japanese and American patients with CKD: a cross-sectional study of the CRIC and CKD-JAC studies. Hypertens Res. 2021; 44(6):700-710. PMC: 8184630. DOI: 10.1038/s41440-020-00608-8. View

5.
Imai E, Matsuo S, Makino H, Watanabe T, Akizawa T, Nitta K . Chronic Kidney Disease Japan Cohort (CKD-JAC) study: design and methods. Hypertens Res. 2008; 31(6):1101-7. DOI: 10.1291/hypres.31.1101. View