» Articles » PMID: 39760983

A Maximum-Use Trial of Ruxolitinib Cream in Children Aged 2-11 Years with Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Overview
Specialty Dermatology
Date 2025 Jan 6
PMID 39760983
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Ruxolitinib cream has demonstrated anti-inflammatory and antipruritic activity and was well tolerated in a phase 3 study in patients aged 2-11 years with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis (AD).

Objective: This study examined the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and quality of life (QoL) with ruxolitinib cream under maximum-use conditions and with longer-term use.

Methods: Eligible patients were aged 2-11 years with moderate to severe AD [Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score 3-4], and ≥ 35% affected body surface area (BSA). Patients applied 1.5% ruxolitinib cream twice daily to all baseline-identified lesions during the 4-week maximum-use period, then to active lesions only up to week 52 (patients with ≤ 20% affected BSA from week 8). Safety was assessed by frequency and severity of adverse events. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed as secondary endpoints, and efficacy and QoL were exploratory endpoints.

Results: Overall, 29 patients (median age 5 years) were enrolled. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 9/29 patients (31.0%); there were no adverse events of special interest (i.e., no serious infections, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, or thromboses) during the study period. Mean steady-state plasma concentration during the maximum-use period was below the known half-maximal inhibitory concentration of Janus kinase-mediated myelosuppression in adults. Reductions in affected BSA and IGA observed at week 4 were sustained with as-needed use through 52 weeks. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes and QoL measures were consistent with efficacy results.

Conclusion: These results support the safety of ruxolitinib cream in children (2-11 years) with AD, including those with extensive disease, and are consistent with previous efficacy findings.

Clinicaltrials:

Gov Identifier: NCT05034822, first registered 30 August 2021.

References
1.
Papp K, Szepietowski J, Kircik L, Toth D, Eichenfield L, Leung D . Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib cream for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: Results from 2 phase 3, randomized, double-blind studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021; 85(4):863-872. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.04.085. View

2.
Wollenberg A, Barbarot S, Bieber T, Christen-Zaech S, Deleuran M, Fink-Wagner A . Consensus-based European guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) in adults and children: part II. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018; 32(6):850-878. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14888. View

3.
Silverberg J, Barbarot S, Gadkari A, Simpson E, Weidinger S, Mina-Osorio P . Atopic dermatitis in the pediatric population: A cross-sectional, international epidemiologic study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021; 126(4):417-428.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.12.020. View

4.
He H, Guttman-Yassky E . JAK Inhibitors for Atopic Dermatitis: An Update. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018; 20(2):181-192. DOI: 10.1007/s40257-018-0413-2. View

5.
Sidbury R, Alikhan A, Bercovitch L, Cohen D, Darr J, Drucker A . Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis in adults with topical therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023; 89(1):e1-e20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.12.029. View