» Articles » PMID: 39758435

A Holistic Approach to the Measurement of Physical Function in Clinical Research

Overview
Journal Digit Biomark
Date 2025 Jan 6
PMID 39758435
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This commentary highlights the evolution of our understanding of physical function (PF) and key models/frameworks that have contributed to the current holistic understanding of PF, which encompasses not only a person's performance but also the environment and any adaptations an individual utilizes. This commentary also addresses how digital health tools can facilitate and complement the assessment of holistic PF and enable both objective and subjective input from the participant in their real-world environment. Lastly, we discuss how successful implementation of digital tools within clinical research requires patient input.

Summary: This commentary highlights how our understanding of PF has evolved to be more holistic.

Key Messages: Inclusion of digital tools within clinical research can provide a path forward to holistically assess PF in a patient-focused manner.

References
1.
Dunton G, Dzubur E, Intille S . Feasibility and Performance Test of a Real-Time Sensor-Informed Context-Sensitive Ecological Momentary Assessment to Capture Physical Activity. J Med Internet Res. 2016; 18(6):e106. PMC: 4909979. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5398. View

2.
Giurgiu M, Niermann C, Ebner-Priemer U, Kanning M . Accuracy of Sedentary Behavior-Triggered Ecological Momentary Assessment for Collecting Contextual Information: Development and Feasibility Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020; 8(9):e17852. PMC: 7525404. DOI: 10.2196/17852. View

3.
Fuentes-Abolafio I, Stubbs B, Perez-Belmonte L, Bernal-Lopez M, Gomez-Huelgas R, Cuesta-Vargas A . Physical functional performance and prognosis in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020; 20(1):512. PMC: 7724724. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-020-01725-5. View

4.
Schalet B, Hays R, Jensen S, Beaumont J, Fries J, Cella D . Validity of PROMIS physical function measured in diverse clinical samples. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 73:112-8. PMC: 4968197. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.039. View

5.
Goldsack J, Coravos A, Bakker J, Bent B, Dowling A, Fitzer-Attas C . Verification, analytical validation, and clinical validation (V3): the foundation of determining fit-for-purpose for Biometric Monitoring Technologies (BioMeTs). NPJ Digit Med. 2020; 3:55. PMC: 7156507. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-020-0260-4. View