Strengthening Tobacco Control Research: Key Factors Impacting Policy Outcomes and Health Equity

Overview

Journal Front Public Health

Specialty Public Health

Date 2025 Jan 6

PMID 39758208

Authors

Bukola Usidame Peters

Natalie McArthur

Andrea Titus

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In this policy brief, we explore several potential drivers of heterogeneity in policy outcomes that can be examined in tobacco control policy evaluations, expanding the evidence base to contribute to continued, equitable progress in reducing tobacco-related health outcomes. We discuss these factors in the context of a hypothetical evaluation of the impact of smoke-free laws on current smoking and quit attempts in the Tobacco Nation. Despite a similar policy environment within the Tobacco Nation, there is variation in the strength of smoke-free law coverage across states. This commentary considers how policy design and other contextual factors, including co-occurring policies, and differential impacts across subgroups, may influence policy-attributable outcomes across time and space.

References

Song A, Dutra L, Neilands T, Glantz S . Association of Smoke-Free Laws With Lower Percentages of New and Current Smokers Among Adolescents and Young Adults: An 11-Year Longitudinal Study. JAMA Pediatr. 2015; 169(9):e152285. PMC: 4577051. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2285. View

Vuolo M, Kelly B, Kadowaki J . Independent and Interactive Effects of Smoking Bans and Tobacco Taxes on a Cohort of US Young Adults. Am J Public Health. 2015; 106(2):374-80. PMC: 4758814. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302968. View

Kunst A . Commentary on Titus et al.: Understanding how smoke-free policies can contribute to smoke-free generations. Addiction. 2021; 117(3):739-740. PMC: 9298895. DOI: 10.1111/add.15748. View

Levy D, Huang A, Havumaki J, Meza R . The role of public policies in reducing smoking prevalence: results from the Michigan SimSmoke tobacco policy simulation model. Cancer Causes Control. 2016; 27(5):615-25. PMC: 4840036. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-016-0735-4. View

Matthay E, Hagan E, Joshi S, Tan M, Vlahov D, Adler N . The Revolution Will Be Hard to Evaluate: How Co-Occurring Policy Changes Affect Research on the Health Effects of Social Policies. Epidemiol Rev. 2021; 43(1):19-32. PMC: 8763115. DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxab009. View

Drope J, Liber A, Cahn Z, Stoklosa M, Kennedy R, Douglas C . Who's still smoking? Disparities in adult cigarette smoking prevalence in the United States. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(2):106-115. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21444. View

Friedman A, Oliver J, Busch S . Adding vaping restrictions to smoke-free air laws: associations with conventional and electronic cigarette use. Addiction. 2021; 116(8):2198-2206. DOI: 10.1111/add.15434. View

Shang C . The effect of smoke-free air law in bars on smoking initiation and relapse among teenagers and young adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015; 12(1):504-20. PMC: 4306876. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120100504. View

Huang J, King B, Babb S, Xu X, Hallett C, Hopkins M . Sociodemographic Disparities in Local Smoke-Free Law Coverage in 10 States. Am J Public Health. 2015; 105(9):1806-13. PMC: 4539828. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302655. View

10.

Bajoga U, Lewis S, McNeill A, Szatkowski L . Does the introduction of comprehensive smoke-free legislation lead to a decrease in population smoking prevalence?. Addiction. 2011; 106(7):1346-54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03446.x. View

11.

Mills S, Rosario C, Yerger V, Kalb M, Ribisl K . Recommendations to advance equity in tobacco control. Tob Control. 2022; 33(e2):e246-e253. PMC: 10277310. DOI: 10.1136/tc-2022-057670. View

12.

Donahoe J, Titus A, Fleischer N . Key Factors Inhibiting Legislative Progress Toward Smoke-Free Coverage in Appalachia. Am J Public Health. 2018; 108(3):372-378. PMC: 5803809. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304244. View

13.

Kelly B, Vuolo M, Orsini M, Maggs J, Staff J . Tobacco Policy and ENDS Policy Influences on Adolescent Vaping Across the U.S. States. Am J Prev Med. 2023; 65(6):1026-1033. PMC: 10799971. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.07.010. View

14.

Jiang N, Gill E, Thorpe L, Rogers E, de Leon C, Anastasiou E . Implementing the Federal Smoke-Free Public Housing Policy in New York City: Understanding Challenges and Opportunities for Improving Policy Impact. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(23). PMC: 8656672. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182312565. View

15.

Yu H, Engberg J, Scharf D . One size fits all? Disentangling the effects of tobacco taxes, laws, and control spending on adult subgroups in the United States. Subst Abus. 2018; 40(1):87-94. DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2018.1449050. View

16.

Kelly B, Vuolo M, Frizzell L, Hernandez E . Denormalization, smoke-free air policy, and tobacco use among young adults. Soc Sci Med. 2018; 211:70-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.051. View

17.

Matthay E, Gottlieb L, Rehkopf D, Tan M, Vlahov D, Glymour M . What to Do When Everything Happens at Once: Analytic Approaches to Estimate the Health Effects of Co-Occurring Social Policies. Epidemiol Rev. 2021; 43(1):33-47. PMC: 8763089. DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxab005. View