» Articles » PMID: 39757334

High-intensity Versus Low-level Laser Therapy in Treatment of Patients with Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: a Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal Lasers Med Sci
Publisher Springer
Date 2025 Jan 5
PMID 39757334
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To compare the effects of High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) versus Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) on shoulder pain and disability, shoulder Range of Motion (ROM), Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT), and sleep quality of patients having Subacromial Impingement Syndrome (SAIS). Forty-two patients with SAIS were randomly assigned into three groups, the HILT group (n = 14), the LLLT group (n = 14), and control group (n = 14). All groups received an exercise program consisted of shoulder muscles stretching and strengthening exercises. Along with the exercise program, the HILT group received HILT at 810 nm /980 nm, and LLLT group received LLLT at 904 nm, three times weekly for three weeks. The primary outcome was the change in shoulder pain and disability measured by Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Secondary outcomes included shoulder ROM using a standard goniometer, PPT measured by pressure algometer, and sleep quality by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Measurements were taken both before and after a 3-week intervention to assess the outcomes. After 3-wk intervention, both the HILT and LLLT groups exhibited significant improvements in all parameters when compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Additionally, there were clinically significant differences between groups supported by a large ES favoring the HILT group for SPADI pain (ηp = 0.71), SPADI disability (ηp = 0.54), SPADI total (ηp = 0.82), PPT (ηp = 0.63), and PSQI (ηp = 0.42). The combination of HILT with exercises proved to be more beneficial in enhancing pain and function, PPT, and sleep quality compared to LLLT combined with exercises in treating patients with SAIS.

References
1.
Singh H, Thind A, Mohamed N . Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Existing Treatment Modalities to Newer Proprioceptive-Based Strategies. Cureus. 2022; 14(8):e28405. PMC: 9509002. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28405. View

2.
Ziradkar R, Best T, Quintero D, Paultre K . Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory and Corticosteroid Injections for Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Health. 2022; 15(4):579-591. PMC: 10293554. DOI: 10.1177/19417381221108726. View

3.
Kim Y, Kim T, Lee J, Hwang J . Glenohumeral versus subacromial steroid injections for impingement syndrome with mild stiffness: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023; 26(4):390-396. PMC: 10698124. DOI: 10.5397/cise.2023.00346. View

4.
Beckerman H, de Bie R, Bouter L, de Cuyper H, Oostendorp R . The efficacy of laser therapy for musculoskeletal and skin disorders: a criteria-based meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Phys Ther. 1992; 72(7):483-91. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/72.7.483. View

5.
Tantawy S, Abdelbasset W, Kamel D, Alrawaili S, Alsubaie S . Laser photobiomodulation is more effective than ultrasound therapy in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a comparative study. Lasers Med Sci. 2018; 34(4):793-800. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-018-2665-8. View