Distractor-specific Control Adaptation in Multidimensional Environments

Overview

Journal Nat Hum Behav

Specialties Psychology
Social Sciences

Date 2025 Jan 3

PMID 39753748

Authors

Davide Gheza

Wouter Kool

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Goal-directed behaviour requires humans to constantly manage and switch between multiple, independent and conflicting sources of information. Conventional cognitive control tasks, however, only feature one task and one source of distraction. Therefore, it is unclear how control is allocated in multidimensional environments. To address this question, we developed a multidimensional task-set interference paradigm, in which people need to manage distraction from three independent dimensions. We use this task to test whether people adapt to previous conflict by enhancing task-relevant information or suppressing task-irrelevant information. Three experiments provided strong evidence for the latter hypothesis. Moreover, control adaptation was highly dimension specific. Conflict from a given dimension only affected processing of that same dimension on subsequent trials, with no evidence for generalization. A new neural network model shows that our results can only be simulated when including multiple independent conflict-detector units. Our results call for an update to classic models of cognitive control and their neurocomputational underpinnings.

References

Lindsay D, Jacoby L . Stroop process dissociations: the relationship between facilitation and interference. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994; 20(2):219-34. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.20.2.219. View

Shenhav A, Botvinick M, Cohen J . The expected value of control: an integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron. 2013; 79(2):217-40. PMC: 3767969. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.007. View

Alexander W, Brown J . Medial prefrontal cortex as an action-outcome predictor. Nat Neurosci. 2011; 14(10):1338-44. PMC: 3183374. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2921. View

Ritz H, Leng X, Shenhav A . Cognitive Control as a Multivariate Optimization Problem. J Cogn Neurosci. 2022; 34(4):569-591. PMC: 8939373. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01822. View

Badre D, Bhandari A, Keglovits H, Kikumoto A . The dimensionality of neural representations for control. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2020; 38:20-28. PMC: 7451207. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.002. View

Fu Z, Beam D, Chung J, Reed C, Mamelak A, Adolphs R . The geometry of domain-general performance monitoring in the human medial frontal cortex. Science. 2022; 376(6593):eabm9922. PMC: 9282918. DOI: 10.1126/science.abm9922. View

Pylyshyn Z, Storm R . Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spat Vis. 1988; 3(3):179-97. DOI: 10.1163/156856888x00122. View

Cohen J, Dunbar K, McClelland J . On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychol Rev. 1990; 97(3):332-61. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.97.3.332. View

Macleod C . Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol Bull. 1991; 109(2):163-203. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163. View

10.

Simon J, Rudell A . Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. J Appl Psychol. 1967; 51(3):300-4. DOI: 10.1037/h0020586. View

11.

Gratton G, Coles M, Donchin E . Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1992; 121(4):480-506. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.121.4.480. View

12.

Egner T, Hirsch J . Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nat Neurosci. 2005; 8(12):1784-90. DOI: 10.1038/nn1594. View

13.

Danielmeier C, Eichele T, Forstmann B, Tittgemeyer M, Ullsperger M . Posterior medial frontal cortex activity predicts post-error adaptations in task-related visual and motor areas. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(5):1780-9. PMC: 6623722. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4299-10.2011. View

14.

Ritz H, Shenhav A . Humans reconfigure target and distractor processing to address distinct task demands. Psychol Rev. 2023; 131(2):349-372. PMC: 11193598. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000442. View

15.

Botvinick M, Braver T, Barch D, Carter C, Cohen J . Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev. 2001; 108(3):624-52. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624. View

16.

Egner T . Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008; 12(10):374-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.001. View

17.

Blais C, Robidoux S, Risko E, Besner D . Item-specific adaptation and the conflict-monitoring hypothesis: a computational model. Psychol Rev. 2007; 114(4):1076-86. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.1076. View

18.

Verguts T, Notebaert W . Hebbian learning of cognitive control: dealing with specific and nonspecific adaptation. Psychol Rev. 2008; 115(2):518-25. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.518. View

19.

Padmala S, Pessoa L . Reward reduces conflict by enhancing attentional control and biasing visual cortical processing. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011; 23(11):3419-32. PMC: 3175266. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00011. View

20.

Bush G, Shin L . The Multi-Source Interference Task: an fMRI task that reliably activates the cingulo-frontal-parietal cognitive/attention network. Nat Protoc. 2007; 1(1):308-13. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2006.48. View