At First Sight: Fetal Eye Movements Reveal a Preference for Face-Like Configurations From 26 Weeks of Gestation

Overview

Journal Dev Sci

Specialty Psychology

Date 2025 Jan 3

PMID 39749645

Authors

Irene Ronga

Karol Poles

Carlotta Pace

Marta Fantoni

Josephine Luppino

Pietro Gaglioti

Tullia Todros

Francesca Garbarini

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Previous research indicates that both adults and newborns show enhanced electrophysiological and behavioral responses to schematic face-like configurations (FCs-three dots composing a downward-pointing triangle), as compared to the inverted configurations (ICs). Even fetuses, when exposed to light stimuli projected through the uterine wall, preferentially orient their heads toward FCs rather than ICs. However, when this effect emerges along the third trimester of pregnancy and in relation to the maturation of which brain structures is still unknown. Here, to provide a sensitive measure of fetal preference for FCs along the whole third trimester, fetal lens movements in response to FCs and ICs was monitored with 2D-ultrasound. In a series of three experiments, fetuses were recruited at 26, 31, and 37 weeks of gestational age and were presented with both flashing and continuous light stimuli. Our results showed that significantly more lens movements were observed in response to continuous as compared to flashing light stimuli. Furthermore, lens movements linearly increased within the third trimester and, regardless of the time-point, significantly more lens movements were observed in response to FCs versus ICs. We also found a significant correlation in the first time-point, wherein the greater the FCs versus ICs differential response the larger the thalamic nuclei dimension. These findings suggest that FC preference is already present at the beginning of the third trimester, as soon as thalamocortical projections are established.

References

Stolte M, Ansorge U . Automatic capture of attention by flicker. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021; 83(4):1407-1415. PMC: 8084820. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02237-2. View

Turati C, Simion F, Milani I, Umilta C . Newborns' preference for faces: what is crucial?. Dev Psychol. 2002; 38(6):875-82. View

Johnson M . Cortical maturation and the development of visual attention in early infancy. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013; 2(2):81-95. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1990.2.2.81. View

Macchi Cassia V, Turati C, Simion F . Can a nonspecific bias toward top-heavy patterns explain newborns' face preference?. Psychol Sci. 2004; 15(6):379-83. DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00688.x. View

Kiuchi M, Nagata N, Ikeno S, Terakawa N . The relationship between the response to external light stimulation and behavioral states in the human fetus: how it differs from vibroacoustic stimulation. Early Hum Dev. 2000; 58(2):153-65. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3782(00)00074-8. View

Galigani M, Ronga I, Bruno V, Castellani N, Rossi Sebastiano A, Fossataro C . Face-like configurations modulate electrophysiological mismatch responses. Eur J Neurosci. 2020; 53(6):1869-1884. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15088. View

Ricci D, Romeo D, Serrao F, Gallini F, Leone D, Longo M . Early assessment of visual function in preterm infants: how early is early?. Early Hum Dev. 2010; 86(1):29-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.11.004. View

Eswaran H, Lowery C, Wilson J, Murphy P, Preissl H . Functional development of the visual system in human fetus using magnetoencephalography. Exp Neurol. 2004; 190 Suppl 1:S52-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.04.007. View

Toulmin H, Beckmann C, OMuircheartaigh J, Ball G, Nongena P, Makropoulos A . Specialization and integration of functional thalamocortical connectivity in the human infant. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(20):6485-90. PMC: 4443373. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1422638112. View

10.

Born A, Rostrup E, Miranda M, Larsson H, Lou H . Visual cortex reactivity in sedated children examined with perfusion MRI (FAIR). Magn Reson Imaging. 2002; 20(2):199-205. DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(02)00469-1. View

11.

Morton J, Johnson M . CONSPEC and CONLERN: a two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychol Rev. 1991; 98(2):164-81. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.164. View

12.

Schweinberger S, Neumann M . Repetition effects in human ERPs to faces. Cortex. 2015; 80:141-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.11.001. View

13.

Donovan T, Dunn K, Penman A, Young R, Reid V . Fetal eye movements in response to a visual stimulus. Brain Behav. 2020; 10(8):e01676. PMC: 7428469. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1676. View

14.

Hevner R . Development of connections in the human visual system during fetal mid-gestation: a DiI-tracing study. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2000; 59(5):385-92. DOI: 10.1093/jnen/59.5.385. View

15.

Dunn K, Reissland N, Reid V . The functional foetal brain: A systematic preview of methodological factors in reporting foetal visual and auditory capacity. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2015; 13:43-52. PMC: 6990098. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.04.002. View

16.

Sheridan C, Matuz T, Draganova R, Eswaran H, Preissl H . Fetal Magnetoencephalography - Achievements and Challenges in the Study of Prenatal and Early Postnatal Brain Responses: A Review. Infant Child Dev. 2010; 19(1):80-93. PMC: 2830651. DOI: 10.1002/icd.657. View

17.

Schopf V, Schlegl T, Jakab A, Kasprian G, Woitek R, Prayer D . The relationship between eye movement and vision develops before birth. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8:775. PMC: 4183095. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00775. View

18.

Johnson M . Subcortical face processing. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005; 6(10):766-74. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1766. View

19.

Buiatti M, Di Giorgio E, Piazza M, Polloni C, Menna G, Taddei F . Cortical route for facelike pattern processing in human newborns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(10):4625-4630. PMC: 6410830. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1812419116. View

20.

Haxby , Hoffman , Gobbini . The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000; 4(6):223-233. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01482-0. View