» Articles » PMID: 39748970

Renewable Energy and Cryptocurrency: A Dual Approach to Economic Viability and Environmental Sustainability

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2025 Jan 3
PMID 39748970
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One of the foremost challenges facing Bitcoin, as the most valuable cryptocurrency operating on a proof-of-work mechanism, is its substantial energy consumption and environmental impact. With the expansion of the Bitcoin market, mining has surged in popularity, particularly in countries where energy and monetary costs are comparatively low. This study aims to assess the impact of utilizing renewable energy from a photovoltaic system for Bitcoin mining, simulating a solar power plant with a 50.91-MW capacity alongside a corresponding Bitcoin mining operation in the United Arab Emirates. Economic evaluations were conducted using comprehensive, historically archived data to ensure results that closely mirror real-world scenarios. Additionally, for a more nuanced comparison, an economic assessment of selling the power plant's electricity to the grid was also performed, with the findings juxtaposed. The outcomes indicate that initiating such a system at the start of 2020 with an investment of approximately $42 million could recoup its costs in about 3.5 years. In contrast, selling electricity to the grid would extend the power plant's return on investment period to 8.1 years. Furthermore, the environmental evaluation revealed that adopting renewable solar energy for mining could avert the emission of around 50,000 tons of CO annually.

References
1.
Liu F, Wang L, Kong D, Shi C, Feng Z, Zhou J . Is there more to bitcoin mining than carbon emissions?. Heliyon. 2023; 9(4):e15099. PMC: 10126855. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15099. View

2.
Meiryani M, Delvin Tandyopranoto C, Emanuel J, Lindawati A, Fahlevi M, Aljuaid M . The effect of global price movements on the energy sector commodity on bitcoin price movement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon. 2022; 8(10):e10820. PMC: 9557919. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10820. View

3.
Swanson H, Ferrari J . Predictors of e-waste: Considerations for community psychology prevention and intervention. J Community Psychol. 2022; 51(5):2001-2009. DOI: 10.1002/jcop.22986. View

4.
Baroiu A, Diaconita V, Oprea S . Bitcoin volatility in bull . bear market-insights from analyzing on-chain metrics and Twitter posts. PeerJ Comput Sci. 2024; 9:e1750. PMC: 10773860. DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1750. View

5.
Abbass K, Qasim M, Song H, Murshed M, Mahmood H, Younis I . A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022; 29(28):42539-42559. PMC: 8978769. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6. View