Service Preferences Among Postpartum Women (non-)affected by Different Types of Intimate Partner Violence: Insights from the Cross-sectional Study INVITE

Overview

Journal BMC Public Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Public Health

Date 2025 Jan 3

PMID 39748350

Authors

Laura M Hausmann

Lara Seefeld

Amera Mojahed

Judith T Mack

Susan Garthus-Niegel

Julia Schellong

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Women in the postpartum period are at greater risk of intimate partner violence (IPV), which may cause physical, sexual, or psychological harm and have a long-lasting negative impact on mother and child. Seeking help in case of IPV in the postpartum period can be difficult.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine service preferences among postpartum women in Germany (non-)affected by IPV.

Methods: In the cross-sectional study INVITE, postpartum mothers (n = 3,509) were interviewed via telephone. Using the WHO-Violence Against Women Instrument (WHO-VAWI), women were divided into groups: non-affected women and women affected by psychological, physical, and/or sexual IPV. Using analyses of variance, group differences regarding preferred services and modes of service provision were assessed. Examined service domains were psychosocial services (e.g., women´s shelter or self-help groups), medical services (e.g., gynecologist or emergency room), and midwives. Modes of service provision included direct communication (e.g., in person or video conference) and indirect communication (e.g., chat or e-mail).

Results: People from the women's social environment (e.g., family, friends) and specialized IPV services, such as women's shelters, were the most preferred support. Regarding service categories, women who experienced any type of IPV rated all three service domains less likely to be used than non-affected women. Most preferred provision mode was "in person". Women affected by physical and/or sexual IPV rated direct modes more negatively than non-affected women. However, there were no differences between (non-)affected women regarding indirect modes, such as e-mails or apps.

Discussion: The present results indicate that services were rated less likely to be used by postpartum women affected by IPV. Potential barriers which lead to these ratings need to be investigated. Efforts should be made to increase awareness of IPV and the beneficial effects of support.

References

Liang B, Goodman L, Tummala-Narra P, Weintraub S . A theoretical framework for understanding help-seeking processes among survivors of intimate partner violence. Am J Community Psychol. 2005; 36(1-2):71-84. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-005-6233-6. View

Black M, Kresnow M, Simon T, Arias I, Shelley G . Telephone survey respondents' reactions to questions regarding interpersonal violence. Violence Vict. 2006; 21(4):445-59. View

Lotzin A, Flechsenhar A, Garthus-Niegel S, Georg A, Holl J, von Hulsen L . [Domestic violence and its psychological consequences during the COVID-19 pandemic-key findings from German-speaking countries]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023; 66(8):920-929. PMC: 10371903. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-023-03747-8. View

Fonseca A, Gorayeb R, Canavarro M . Women׳s help-seeking behaviours for depressive symptoms during the perinatal period: Socio-demographic and clinical correlates and perceived barriers to seeking professional help. Midwifery. 2015; 31(12):1177-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.09.002. View

Schellong J, Epple F, Lorenz P, Ritschel G, Croy I, Lenk M . [Domestic Violence and Intimate Partner Violence - a Challenge within the Health Care Sector - Result of a Survey Among Physicians]. Psychiatr Prax. 2021; 49(7):359-366. DOI: 10.1055/a-1630-4619. View

Krugman S, Witting M, Furuno J, Hirshon J, Limcangco R, Perisse A . Perceptions of help resources for victims of intimate partner violence. J Interpers Violence. 2004; 19(7):766-77. DOI: 10.1177/0886260504265621. View

Chang J, Cluss P, Ranieri L, Hawker L, Buranosky R, Dado D . Health care interventions for intimate partner violence: what women want. Womens Health Issues. 2005; 15(1):21-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2004.08.007. View

MacGregor J, Burd C, Mantler T, McLean I, Veenendaal J, Rodger S . Experiences of Women Accessing Violence Against Women Outreach Services in Canada During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Brief Report. J Fam Violence. 2022; :1-9. PMC: 9049926. DOI: 10.1007/s10896-022-00398-2. View

Sword W, Busser D, Ganann R, Mcmillan T, Swinton M . Women's care-seeking experiences after referral for postpartum depression. Qual Health Res. 2008; 18(9):1161-73. DOI: 10.1177/1049732308321736. View

10.

Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008; 42(2):377-81. PMC: 2700030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. View

11.

Tavrow P, Azucar D, Huynh D, Yoo C, Liang D, Pathomrit W . Encouraging Asian Immigrant Women to Disclose Intimate Partner Violence in Primary Care Settings. J Interpers Violence. 2020; 37(7-8):NP5626-NP5648. DOI: 10.1177/0886260520959642. View

12.

Lucea M, Stockman J, Mana-Ay M, Bertrand D, Callwood G, Coverston C . Factors influencing resource use by African American and African Caribbean women disclosing intimate partner violence. J Interpers Violence. 2013; 28(8):1617-41. PMC: 3622793. DOI: 10.1177/0886260512468326. View

13.

Beaulaurier R, Seff L, Newman F, Dunlop B . Internal barriers to help seeking for middle-aged and older women who experience intimate partner violence. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2006; 17(3):53-74. DOI: 10.1300/j084v17n03_04. View

14.

Bauleni E, Hooker L, Vally H, Taft A . Intimate-partner violence and reproductive decision-making by women attending Victorian Maternal- and Child-Health services: a cross-sectional study. Aust J Prim Health. 2018; 24(5):422-427. DOI: 10.1071/PY17183. View

15.

Barbara G, Viero A, Pellizzone I, Buggio L, Facchin F, Cattaneo C . Intimate Partner Violence in the COVID-19 Era: A Health, Psychological, Forensic and Legal Perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(9). PMC: 9104607. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19094973. View

16.

Glass N, Clough A, Messing J, Bloom T, Brown M, Eden K . Longitudinal Impact of the myPlan App on Health and Safety Among College Women Experiencing Partner Violence. J Interpers Violence. 2021; 37(13-14):NP11436-NP11459. DOI: 10.1177/0886260521991880. View

17.

Evans M, Feder G . Help-seeking amongst women survivors of domestic violence: a qualitative study of pathways towards formal and informal support. Health Expect. 2015; 19(1):62-73. PMC: 5055220. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12330. View

18.

Burd C, McLean I, MacGregor J, Mantler T, Veenendaal J, Wathen C . "Our services are not the same": the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on care interactions in women's shelters. BMC Womens Health. 2023; 23(1):427. PMC: 10422783. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02541-7. View

19.

Duran-Martin E, Vives-Cases C, Otero-Garcia L, Castellanos-Torres E, Sanz-Barbero B . Do we have friendly services to meet the needs of young women exposed to intimate partner violence in the Madrid region?. Health Expect. 2022; 25(3):1058-1068. PMC: 9122426. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13453. View

20.

Allen-Leap M, Hooker L, Wild K, Wilson I, Pokharel B, Taft A . Seeking Help From Primary Health-Care Providers in High-Income Countries: A Scoping Review of the Experiences of Migrant and Refugee Survivors of Domestic Violence. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022; 24(5):3715-3731. DOI: 10.1177/15248380221137664. View